BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    tract home Anaheim California custom homes Anaheim California housing Anaheim California structural steel construction Anaheim California institutional building Anaheim California condominium Anaheim California low-income housing Anaheim California Subterranean parking Anaheim California retail construction Anaheim California multi family housing Anaheim California parking structure Anaheim California concrete tilt-up Anaheim California industrial building Anaheim California casino resort Anaheim California production housing Anaheim California custom home Anaheim California townhome construction Anaheim California high-rise construction Anaheim California Medical building Anaheim California landscaping construction Anaheim California hospital construction Anaheim California condominiums Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
     
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California

    No Resulting Loss From Deck Collapsing Due to Rot

    No Coverage for Counterclaim Alleging Construction Defects Pled as Breach of Contract

    Avoid Gaps in Construction Defect Coverage

    Homeowners Sue Over Sinkholes, Use Cash for Other Things

    Construction Defect Litigation at San Diego’s Alicante Condominiums?

    Contractor Manslaughter? Safety Shortcuts Are Not Worth It

    Largest Per Unit Settlement Ever in California Construction Defect Case?

    Insurer Has Duty to Defend in Water Intrusion Case

    Las Vegas Home Builder Still in Bankruptcy

    Cabinetmaker Exceeds Expectations as Conditions Improve

    HOA Has No Claim to Extend Statute of Limitations in Construction Defect Case

    Insurer’s Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Earth Movement Exclusion Denied

    Consumer Protection Act Whacks Seattle Roofing Contractor

    Residential Construction: Shrinking Now, Growing Later?

    Eighth Circuit Remands to Determine Applicability of Collapse Exclusion

    Illinois Court Determines Insurer Must Defend Negligent Misrepresentation Claim

    Mississippi exclusions j(5) and j(6) “that particular part”

    Ensuing Losses From Faulty Workmanship Must be Covered

    Vegas Hi-Rise Not Earthquake Safe

    Ensuing Loss Provision Does Not Salvage Coverage

    “Other Insurance” and Indemnity Provisions Determine Which Insurer Must Cover

    Nevada Construction Defect Lawyers Dead in Possible Suicides

    A Lien Might Just Save Your Small Construction Business

    Policing Those Subcontractors: It Might Take Extra Effort To Be An Additional Insured

    Local Government Waives Construction Fees to Spur Jobs

    United States District Court Confirms That Insurers Can Be Held Liable Under The CCPA.

    Coverage Rejected Under Owned Property and Alienated Property Exclusions

    Court Requires Adherence to “Good Faith and Fair Dealing” in Construction Defect Coverage

    New Jersey Court Rules on Statue of Repose Case

    Boyfriend Pleads Guilty in Las Vegas Construction Defect Scam Suicide

    North Carolina Exclusion j(6) “That Particular Part”

    Contractor Sues License Board

    When is a Construction Project truly “Complete”? That depends. (law note)

    In Colorado, Repair Vendors Can Bring First-Party Bad Faith Actions For Amounts Owed From an Insurer

    Ensuing Loss Provision Found Ambiguous

    New Web Site Tracks Settled Construction Defect Claims

    Statute of Repose Dependant on When Subcontractors Finished

    Increased Expenditure on Injuries for New York City School Construction

    Arizona Supreme Court Confirms Eight-Year Limit on Construction Defect Lawsuits

    Construction Firm Charged for Creating “Hail” Damage

    Quarter Four a Good One for Luxury Homebuilder

    Exclusions Bar Coverage for Damage Caused by Chinese Drywall

    Contractor Sues Supplier over Defective Products

    Insurance Policy Provides No Coverage For Slab Collapse in Vision One

    Insurance Company Must Show that Lead Came from Building Materials

    Surveyors Statute Trumps Construction Defect Claim in Tennessee

    JDi Data Introduces Mobile App for Litigation Cost Allocation

    Colorado Statutes of Limitations and Repose, A First Step in Construction Defect Litigation

    Construction Delayed by Discovery of Bones

    Construction Defect Bill Introduced in California

    Construction Defect Notice in the Mailbox? Respond Appropriately

    Illinois Court Determines Insurer Must Defend Property Damage Caused by Faulty Workmanship

    Pennsylvania Court Extends Construction Defect Protections to Subsequent Buyers

    Hovnanian Increases Construction Defect Reserves for 2012

    Insurer Must Cover Construction Defects Claims under Actual Injury Rule

    West Hollywood Building: Historic Building May Be Defective

    US Courts in Nevada Busy with Yellow Brass

    Discovery Ordered in Nevada Construction Defect Lawsuit

    Construction Defects in Home a Breach of Contract

    Preparing For the Worst with Smart Books & Records

    California Bill Would Notify Homeowners on Construction Defect Options

    No Coverage for Negligent Misrepresentation without Allegations of “Bodily Injury” or “Property Damage”

    Drug Company Provides Cure for Development Woes

    Failure to Meet Code Case Remanded to Lower Court for Attorney Fees

    Subcontractor Not Liable for Defending Contractor in Construction Defect Case

    Fire Reveals Defects, Appeals Court Affirms Judgment against Builder

    Follow Up on Continental Western v. Shay Construction

    Reference to "Man Made" Movement of Earth Corrects Ambiguity

    Florida Construction Defect Case Settled for $3 Million

    Window Manufacturer Weathers Recession by Diversifying

    Lower Court “Eminently Reasonable” but Wrong in Construction Defect Case

    Certificate of Merit to Sue Architects or Engineers Bill Proposed

    Construction Defect Lawsuit Stayed by SB800

    Colorado “occurrence”

    Court Voids Settlement Agreement in Construction Defect Case

    Faulty Workmanship may be an Occurrence in Indiana CGL Policies

    Delaware “occurrence” and exclusions j(5) and j(6)

    Lockton Expands Construction and Design Team

    BUILD Act Inching Closer To Reality

    In Re Golba: The Knaubs v. Golba and Rollison, Debtors

    After Katrina Came Homes that Could Withstand Isaac

    Landmark San Diego Hotel Settles Defects Suit for $6.4 Million

    Texas exclusions j(5) and j(6).

    Arbitrator May Use Own Discretion in Consolidating Construction Defect Cases

    Legislatures Shouldn’t Try to Do the Courts’ Job

    Building Inspector Jailed for Taking Bribes

    Death of Construction Defect Lawyer Ruled a Suicide

    Florida: No Implied Warranties for Neighborhood Improvements

    Houses Can Still Make Cents: Illinois’ Implied Warranty of Habitability

    Construction Defects as Occurrences, Better Decided in Law than in Courts
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Anaheim, California Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 5,500 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Anaheim's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    Liability policy covers negligent construction: GA high court

    October 31, 2010 — Original article by Michael Bradford in Business Insurance

    ATLANTA—Negligent construction that results in damage to surrounding property constitutes an occurrence under a commercial general liability policy, the Georgia Supreme Court has ruled.

    In a 6-1 opinion Monday in American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Co. Inc. vs. Hathaway Development Co. Inc., the Georgia high court upheld a lower court ruling that the general contractor’s claim for damage caused by a subcontractor’s faulty plumbing work was covered.

    The ruling on construction defects is the latest in number of such cases across the United States

    Read Full Story...

    Reprinted courtesy of Michael Bradford of Business Insurance.


    Safe Harbors- not just for Sailors anymore (or, why advance planning can prevent claims of defective plans & specs) (law note)

    August 17, 2011 — Melissa Brumback

    Have you ever considered a “Safe Harbor Provision” for your Owner-Architect or Owner-Engineer contract? Maybe it is time that you do.

    As you are (probably too well) aware, on every construction project there are changes. Some of these are due to the owner’s change of heart, value engineering concerns, contractor failures, and material substitutions. Some may be because of a design error, omission, or drawing conflict. It happens.

    A “Safe Harbor Provision” is a provision that establishes an acceptable percentage of increased construction costs (that is, a percentage of the project’s contingency). The idea is that if the construction changes attributable to the designer is within this percentage, no claim will be made by the Owner for design defects.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Melissa Brumback of Ragsdale Liggett PLLC. Ms. Brumback can be contacted at mbrumback@rl-law.com.


    Important Information Regarding Colorado Mechanic’s Lien Rights.

    November 7, 2012 — David McLain, Colorado Construction Litigation

    With payment problems in the construction economy having accelerated over the past few years, there has been a substantial increase in mechanic’s lien activity and associated litigation. The typical mechanic’s lien claimant is a material supplier, a trade subcontractor, or even a general contractor that has not been paid by the developer/owner of the construction project. The reason for filing a mechanic’s lien claim is that it offers the prospect in many cases to make the unpaid construction professional a priority creditor, with a lien on the real estate that is superior to the construction lender.

    One of the primary rules governing a mechanic’s lien claim is that the creditor’s formal written “Notice of Intent to File a Mechanic’s Lien” (hereafter “Lien Notice”) must be (1) served on the owner of the property for which the work was done or the materials used, and (2) served at the same time on the general contractor who has handled the construction project. After the creditor has made service of the lien claim by USPS certified mail (using the green return receipt card for proof of service) or separate personal delivery of the notice to the property owner and general contractor, ten full days must pass (not including the date of mailing of the notices) before the lien notice is filed in the public records.

    After ten days have expired following the date of mailing using certified mail, or personal delivery of the notice to the property owner and the general contractor, the lien notice can be filed to make the lien valid.

    Reprinted courtesy of David M. McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC. Mr. McLain can be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    Read the full story…


    Former New York Governor to Head Construction Monitoring Firm

    September 13, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    David Paterson, who succeeded Eliot Spitzer as Governor of New York, has started a new venture after leaving the Governor’s office in construction integrity monitoring. WNYC reports that Paterson will be the majority owner of Icon Compliance Services, LLC, which will both conduct investigations and work with law enforcement officials. Paterson says that in government projects “often concessions are made for political reasons in the public sector and then you never really get a product that you paid for.”

    Paterson will be working with a former vice president of Bovis Construction, Brian Aryai, who is also a former U.S. Treasury Agent. Aryai said that “it is astounding that some of the fraud that has come to the surface in the recent past,” and describes it as “almost laughable they were not detected.” Aryai tipped federal prosecutors that Bovis had been over billing on projects for at least a decade.

    Read the full story…


    Building Inspector Jailed for Taking Bribes

    September 30, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The LA Times reports that Raoul Germain, a city Los Angeles building inspector has been sentenced to 21 months in prison after pleading guilty to taking bribes. Germain was caught as part of an FBI sting operation in which he approved work in exchange for thousands of dollars in bribes. The Times notes that that in some cases, Germain never visited the construction sites. Germain was offered a chance to cooperate with investigators. His lawyer, Steve Cron asked the Times, “What do you think happens to someone who cooperates?”

    In addition to Germain, another city inspector has pleaded guilty to taking bribes and two more employees of the Department of Building and Safety have been fired in connection with the investigation.

    Read the full story…


    Partial Settlement in DeKalb Construction Management Case

    July 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The DeKalb County School District has made a partial settlement in a lawsuit over their claims of mismanagement of construction projects. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports that the school board settled with E. R. Mitchell & Co., the smaller of two firms that they have sued. As part of the settlement, Mitchell will be testifying against their former partner. Claims from the other side of the lawsuit are that the school board improperly fired the Heery/Mitchell partnership. The superintendant who fired the company, Crawford Lewis, and his chief operations office, Pat Reid, have since been charged with criminal conspiracy to defraud the construction program. A lawyer for Heery said that “we believe that when presented to a jury, Heery will be vindicated.”

    Read the full story…


    Appropriation Bill Cuts Military Construction Spending

    June 15, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The Hill reports that HR 2055, the Military Construction, Veterans Affairs (VA) and Related Agencies bill, has passed with only five votes in opposition. The bill cuts the budget for military construction spending by $2.6 billion due to anticipated base closures.

    The bill includes $186 million for family housing construction by the Army, $100 million for family housing construction by the Navy and Marines, and $84 million for family construction by the Air Force, with an additional $50 million allocated for the DOD outside the military branches. By the act, these funds will remain available until September 30, 2016.

    Read the full story…

    Read HR 2055


    Five Years of Great Legal Blogging at Insurance Law Hawaii

    December 9, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Our congratulations to Tred Eyerly who has been blogging at Insurance Law Hawaii for five years now. Over the years, he has posted more than five hundred posts and has provided us all with fascinating insights into the laws on insurance coverage. He describes his blog as “a commentary on insurance coverage issues in Hawaii and beyond.” We are grateful that the “beyond” has just in the last few weeks included Colorado, Illinois, Washington, Minnesota, and Rhode Island (about as far from the island of Hawaii as you can get).

    You can read his blog at Insurance Law Hawaii.


    Hovnanian Sees Second-Quarter Profit, Points to Recovery

    June 19, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Hovnanian Enterprises has shown a profit in the second quarter, which the company attributes to recovery in the homebuilding industry. Apart from a sales promotion in 2007, the company sold more homes per community in April than it has in any other month since 2006. Ara K. Hovnanian said that “the sales improvements we have experienced are fairly wide-based in terms of geography, price points and buyer profiles.”

    The quarter’s profit was $1.8 million. In the year prior, Hovnanian faced losses of $72.7 million. The Wall Street Journal’s Marketwatch reported that Hovnanian’s stock price recently went up 19%.

    Read the full story…


    Bill Seeks to Protect Legitimate Contractors

    December 20, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The California construction industry sees Senate Bill 863 as a needed help to legitimate construction businesses. The bill introduces regulations that will help shut down fraudulent contractors and help reduce workers’ compensation fraud. John Upshaw of the Independent Roofing Contractors of California described the revenue lost to California and other states as “phenomenal,” saying that “we need to continue the coordinated efforts if we are to see true workers’ compensation reform.”

    Read the full story…


    Colorado statutory “property damage” caused by an “occurrence”

    August 4, 2011 — CDCoverage.com

    Colorado General Assembly House Bill 10-1394 was signed into law by the Governor on May 21, 2010, codified at Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-20-808 (2010)

    13-20-808. Insurance policies issued to construction professionals

    (1) (a) The general assembly finds and determines that:

    (I) The interpretation of insurance policies issued to construction professionals is of vital importance to the economic and social welfare of the citizens of Colorado and in furthering the purposes of this part 8.

    (II) Insurance policies issued to construction professionals have become increasingly complex, often containing multiple, lengthy endorsements and exclusions conflicting with the reasonable expectations of the insured.

    (III) The correct interpretation of coverage for damages arising out of construction defects is in the best interest of insurers, construction professionals, and property owners.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of CDCoverage.com


    Construction on the Rise in Washington Town

    June 16, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The Kitsap Sun reports that Gig Harbor, a town in the area near Tacoma, Washington, has had a 60% increase in building permit applications as compared to 2010. May, 2011 had as many permits issued for single-family residences in Gig Harbor as were issued for all of 2010. Additionally, a Safeway shopping center on Point Fosdick is described by Dick Bower, Gig Harbor Building and Fire Safety Director, as “a huge project and it’s going to bring in quite a bit of revenue.” He called the increase in building “economic recovery at the grassroots level.”

    Bower said that the building officials in other towns have also seen upswings in construction. He anticipates more activity in the future.

    Read the full story…


    Louisiana Politicians Struggle on Construction Bills, Hospital Redevelopment

    June 16, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Louisiana politicians are still working on a compromise in the state’s construction budget, as reported in the Times-Picayune. Rob Marrianneax, the chair of the Senate Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Committee, removed a $45 million request from Governor Bobby Jindal and added $4 million for projects that Jindal vetoed last year.

    Two senators have formed competing plans to fund redevelopment construction for New Orleans’s Methodist Hospital. Mitch Landrieu, the mayor of New Orleans, hoped for $30 million dollars in state bonds. Senator Cynthia Willard-Lewis proposed an amendment that would supply $1.6 million, while Senator J.P. Morrell has an amendment that would supply $4 million.

    Read the full story…


    Construction Law Client Alert: California Is One Step Closer to Prohibiting Type I Indemnity Agreements In Private Commercial Projects

    June 15, 2011 — Haight Brown & Bonesteel, LLP

    On June 1, 2011 by majority vote, the California Senate passed Senate Bill 474, which would amend Civil Code section 2782, and add Civil Code section 2782.05. The passage of this new law is a critical development for real estate developers, general contractors and subcontractors because it will affect how these projects are insured and how disputes are resolved.

    Civil Code section 2782 was amended in 2007 to prohibit Type I indemnity agreements for residential projects only. Since 2007, various trade associations and labor unions have lobbied to expand those very same restrictions to other projects. These new provisions apply to contracts, entered into after January 1, 2013, that are not for residential projects, and that are not executed by a public entity. The revisions provide that any provision in a contract purporting to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend another for their negligence or other fault is against public policy and void. These provisions cannot be waived.

    A provision in a contract requiring additional insured coverage is also void and unenforceable to the extent it would be prohibited under the new law. Moreover, the new law does not apply to wrap-up insurance policies or programs, or a cause of action for breach of contract or warranty that exists independently of the indemnity obligation.

    The practical impact of this new law is that greater participation in wrap-up insurance programs will likely result. While many wrap-up programs suffer from problems such as insufficient limits, and disputes about funding the self-insured retention, the incentive for the developer or general contractor to utilize wrap-up insurance will be greater than ever before because they will no longer be able to spread the risk of the litigation to the trades and the trade carriers.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Steve Cvitanovic of Haight Brown & Bonesteel, LLP.


    Construction Workers Unearth Bones

    June 28, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    While digging for a new steam line at Eastern Michigan University, workers unearthed some old bones. Experts have yet to determine if the bones are human or animal, however Walter Kraft, the EMU vice president of communications, noted that a handle also unearthed might have come from a casket. Cindy Heflin, reporting in AnnArbor.com notes that until 1900 a Catholic cemetery was located in the area. Although the bodies were relocated, these may have been left behind.

    Read the full story…


    Insurance for Defective Construction Now in Third Edition

    November 7, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Available both in print and online, the International Risk Management Institute, Inc has brought out a third edition of Insurance for Defective Construction. The work is written by Patrick J. Wielinski of Cokinos, Bosien & Young, a Dallas-Fort Worth law firm. Mr. Wielinski practice focuses on insurance coverage. Insurance for Defective Construction is described as “a must read for anyone who buys, sell, or underwrites construction insurance or who becomes involved in construction claims.”

    Read the full story…


    A Downside of Associational Standing - HOA's Claims Against Subcontractors Barred by Statute of Limitations

    March 28, 2012 — Bret Cogdill, Colorado Construction Litigation

    In multi-family construction defect litigation in Colorado, homeowners associations rely on associational standing to pursue claims affecting more than two units and to bring claims covering an entire development. This practice broadens an association’s case beyond what individual, aggrieved owners would otherwise bring on their own against a developer or builder-vendor. However, reliance on associational standing to combine homeowners’ defect claims into a single lawsuit has its drawbacks to homeowners.

    A recent order in the case Villa Mirage Condominium Owners’ Association, Inc., v. Stetson 162, LLC, et al., in El Paso County District Court, presents an example. There, the HOA unsuccessfully sought a determination from the court that its claims against subcontractors were not barred by the statute of limitations. To do so, the HOAs attempted to apply the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act (“CCIOA”), which governs the creation and operation of HOAs, and a statute intended to apply to persons under a legal disability.

    Under CCIOA, during the period of “declarant control” the developer may appoint members to the association’s executive board until sufficient homeowners have moved into the development and taken seats on the board.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Bret Cogdill of Higgins, Hopkins, McClain & Roswell, LLC. Mr. Cogdill can be contacted at cogdill@hhmrlaw.com.


    Environment Decision May Expand Construction Defect Claims

    August 16, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Could a California Supreme Court decision on environmental claims have an effect on construction defect cases? Jonathan B. Sokol, a lawyer at Greenberg Glusker argues just that in a post on his firm’s blog. He notes that the California Supreme Court has held that “the ‘all sums” method of allocation applies in California” and that “an insurer cannot limit its liability to just the amount of loss that occurred in its particular policy period.” While his focus is on environmental cases, he says that “the decision could also potentially expand the scope of coverage for construction defect claims and other claims involving continuous and progressive property damage and bodily injury.

    Read the full story…