BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Medical building expert witness Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska institutional building expert witness Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska multi family housing expert witness Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska tract home expert witness Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska office building expert witness Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska condominiums expert witness Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska structural steel construction expert witness Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska parking structure expert witness Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska retail construction expert witness Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska mid-rise construction expert witness Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska casino resort expert witness Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska housing expert witness Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska Subterranean parking expert witness Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska landscaping construction expert witness Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska high-rise construction expert witness Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska hospital construction expert witness Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska townhome construction expert witness Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska custom home expert witness Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska low-income housing expert witness Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska industrial building expert witness Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska custom homes expert witness Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska concrete tilt-up expert witness Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant, Alaska

    Alaska Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB151 limits the damages that can be awarded in a construction defect lawsuit to the actual cost of fixing the defect and other closely related costs such as reasonable temporary housing expenses during the repair of the defect, any reduction in market value cause by the defect, and reasonable and necessary attorney fees.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Southern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0240
    PO Box 6291
    Ketchikan, AK 99901
    http://www.sealaskabuilders.com

    Northern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0225
    9085 Glacier Highway Ste 202
    Juneau, AK 99801
    http://www.seabia.com

    Kenai Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 0233
    PO Box 1753
    Kenai, AK 99611
    http://www.kenaipeninsulabuilders.com

    Home Builders Association of Alaska
    Local # 0200
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518
    http://www.buildersofalaska.com

    Home Builders Association of Anchorage
    Local # 0215
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518
    http://www.buildersofalaska.com

    Mat-Su Home Builders Association
    Local # 0230
    609 S KNIK GOOSE BAY RD STE G
    Wasilla, AK 99654
    http://www.matsuhomebuilders.com

    Interior Alaska Builders Association
    Local # 0235
    938 Aspen Street
    Fairbanks, AK 99709
    http://www.InteriorABA.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska

    Coverage Found for Faulty Workmanship Damaging Other Property

    The Conscious Builder – Interview with Casey Grey

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (01/11/23) – Construction Tech, Housing Market Confidence, and Decarbonization

    California Contractors – You Should Know That Section 7141.5 May Be Your Golden Ticket

    Recession Graduates’ Six-Year Gap in Homeownership

    Rather Than Limit Decision to "That Particular Part" of Developer's Policy Necessary to Bar Coverage, 10th Circuit Renders Questionable Decision on Exclusion j(6)

    Newmeyer & Dillion Named a Best Law Firm in 2019 in Multiple Practice Areas by U.S. News-Best Lawyers

    Indemnity Clauses—What do they mean, and what should you be looking for?

    Duty to Defend Affirmed in Connecticut Construction Defect Case

    Construction Delayed by Discovery of Bones

    California Supreme Court Allows Claim Under Unfair Competition Statute To Proceed

    Ohio Court Refuses to Annualize Multi-Year Policies’ Per Occurrence Limits

    Automating Your Home? There’s an App for That

    Commercial Real Estate in 2023: A Snapshot

    Condominium Exclusion Bars Coverage for Construction Defect

    Giving Insurance Carrier Prompt Notice of Claim to Avoid “Untimely Notice” Defense

    Tax Increase Pumps $52 Billion Into California Construction

    Construction Up in Northern Ohio

    Convictions Obtained in Las Vegas HOA Fraud Case

    Construction Defect Lawsuits Hinted for Dublin, California

    Soldiers Turn Brickies as U.K. Homebuilders Seek Workers

    Condominium's Agent Owes No Duty to Injured Apartment Owner

    How VR and AR Will Help in Remote Expert Assistance

    In Pricey California, Renters Near Respite From Landlord Gouging

    2018 Construction Outlook: Mature Expansion, Deceleration in Some Sectors, Continued Growth in Others

    Traub Lieberman Chair Emeritus Awarded the 2022 Vince Donohue Award by the International Association of Claim Professionals

    Reminder: Your MLA Notice Must Have Your License Number

    Florida Court of Appeals Holds Underlying Tort Case Must Resolve Before Third-Party Spoliation Action Can Be Litigated

    St. Mary & St. John Coptic Orthodox Church v. SBS Insurance Services, Inc.

    NY Appellate Court Holds Common Interest Privilege Applies to Parties to a Merger

    Ninth Circuit Upholds Corps’ Issuance of CWA Section 404 Permit for Newhall Ranch Project Near Santa Clarita, CA

    COVID-izing Your Construction Contract

    Eleventh Circuit Finds No “Property Damage” Where Defective Component Failed to Cause Damage to Other Non-Defective Components

    Managing Partner Jeff Dennis Recognized as One of the Most Influential Business People & Opinion Shapers in Orange County

    Construction News Roundup

    Construction Robots 2023

    Texas Federal Court Upholds Professional Services Exclusion to Preclude Duty to Defend

    UK Court Rules Against Bechtel in High-Speed Rail Contract Dispute

    NY Estimating Consultant Settles $3.1M Government Project Fraud Case

    Appellate Court Endorses Discretionary Test for Vicarious Disqualification of Law Firms Due To New Attorney’s Conflict

    Safety, Technology Combine to Change the Construction Conversation

    Insured's Motion for Reconsideration on Protecting the Integrity of Referral Sources under Florida Statute s. 542.335

    Quarter Four a Good One for Luxury Homebuilder

    How Do You Get to the Five Year Mark? Some Practical Advice

    Thanks for Four Years of Recognition from JD Supra’s Readers’ Choice Awards

    Just Because You Label It A “Trade Secret” Does Not Make It A “Trade Secret”

    Alleged Defective Water Pump Leads to 900K in Damages

    Some Work Cannot be Included in a Miller Act Claim

    PSA: Virginia DOLI Amends COVID Workplace Standard

    Self-Storage Magnates Cash In on the Surge in Real Estate
    Corporate Profile

    BUILT UP ROOFING EXPERT WITNESS FORT YUKON ALASKA ALASKA EXPERT WITNESS CONCRETE FAILURE TESTIFYING CONSULTANT ALASKA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately five thousand construction and design related expert witness designations, the Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant, Alaska Construction Expert Directory provides a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking meaningful resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides building related consulting and expert witness support services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing captive resources which comprise testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, the firm brings a wealth of experience and local capabilities to Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant and the surrounding areas.

    Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska soil failure expert witnessBuilt up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska expert witness concrete failureBuilt up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessBuilt up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska architecture expert witnessBuilt up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska civil engineer expert witnessBuilt up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska roofing construction expertBuilt up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant Alaska construction claims expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Built up roofing expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure testifying consultant, Alaska

    University of Tennessee Commits to $1.9B Capital Plan

    August 07, 2023 —
    A nearly $2-billion funding plan approved by University of Tennessee trustees signals the go-ahead for 15 new capital projects at five locations including research, science and housing facilities along with a planned entertainment district for Neyland Stadium, home of the university's football team. Reprinted courtesy of Stephanie Loder, Engineering News-Record ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com Read the full story...

    Creeping Incrementalism in Downstream Insurance: Carriers are Stretching Standard CGL Concepts to Untenable Limits

    October 17, 2023 —
    In the construction sector, the importance of closely vetting downstream parties’ insurance has never been more critical. The markets have been hardening with no seeming end in sight and carriers are looking for any way to get an edge. Owners and general contractors need to be on the lookout for ever broader carrier-specific expansions of standard insurance provisions that are perilous for risk transfer. We are seeing more and more terms that go against the intent of ISO standard which is what is almost universally required in construction contracts. One area where carriers are deviating from standard concepts is within pre-existing injury or damage exclusions in Commercial General Liability (“CGL”) policies. It is almost a universal requirement that downstream parties provide additional insured coverage to owners and general contractors on ISO form CG 00 01. Generally, ISO standard language provides coverage for sums the insured becomes legally obligated to pay as damages because of bodily injury or property damage. One of the few main requirements to trigger coverage is that the injury or damage must occur during the policy period. Over the years, ISO standard language has evolved to exclude injury or damage if an insured or certain persons knew that it had occurred before the policy period. Additionally, injury or damage is deemed to have been known to have occurred under certain circumstances. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Eric M. Clarkson, Saxe Doernberger & Vita
    Mr. Clarkson may be contacted at EClarkson@sdvlaw.com

    Building Resiliency: Withstanding Wildfires and Other Natural Disasters

    September 25, 2023 —
    According to the National Fire Protection Association, between 2016 and 2020 an estimated average of 4,300 fires per year plagued structures under construction, adding up to about $376 million in annual property damage. More recently, the National Centers for Environmental Information reported that wildfires accounted for more than $3.2 billion in damages across the United States. These figures alone point to the heightened awareness that all companies—particularly construction companies—should maintain surrounding the unique challenges and risks that wildfires can present and how they could potentially impact the integrity of projects and the associated safety of their workers. As North America grapples with the increasing frequency and severity of wildfires, hurricanes and additional severe weather events, numerous industries have had to adapt and implement proactive measures to minimize their risks and associated exposures. The impact of these natural disasters on the construction industry is indisputable, necessitating proactive measures that construction companies should seriously consider adopting to effectively mitigate those risks, efficiently navigate insurance complexities and seamlessly integrate data-driven solutions alongside modern tools like AI and predictive modeling. Reprinted courtesy of Bill Creedon, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...
    Mr. Creedon may be contacted at bill.creedon@wtwco.com

    Courthouse Reporter Series: The Travails of Statutory Construction...Defining “Labor” under the Miller Act

    August 01, 2023 —
    In a recent case—United States ex rel. Dickson v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland (“Dickson”)—the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recently re-examined and defined what work qualifies as “labor” under the Miller Act. United States ex rel. Dickson v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland, No. 21-160, 67 F.4th 182 (4th Cir. April 26, 2023) (slip op.). Unlike private projects, unpaid subcontractors cannot encumber the federal government’s property with mechanics liens. Instead, the Miller Act provides a remedy for subcontractors in the form of a payment bond on all federal public works contracts exceeding $100,000. 40 U.S.C. § 3131(b). In the Dickson case, Claimant Elliot Dickson served as a subcontractor to Forney Enterprises (“Forney”), with whom the Department of Defense (the “DOD”) contracted to renovate several staircases and the fire suppression systems at the Pentagon. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brendan J. Witry, Conway & Mrowiec Attorneys LLLP
    Mr. Witry may be contacted at bjw@cmcontractors.com

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s 2023 Mountain States Super Lawyers Rising Stars!

    August 07, 2023 —
    BWB&O is excited to announce Las Vegas Partners Devin Gifford and Madeline Arcellana have been selected in the 2023 Mountain States Super Lawyers list as Rising Stars for their work in Civil Litigation. To read Super Lawyers’ digital publication, please click here. SELECTED AS RISING STARS Devin Gifford: 2023 Madeline Arcellana: 2023 Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Congratulations to Wilke Fleury’s 2023 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!!

    July 10, 2023 —
    Wilke Fleury is extremely proud that 18 of its incredible attorneys have been selected as 2023 Northern California Super Lawyers or Rising Stars! Super Lawyers rates attorneys in each state using a patented selection process and publishes a yearly magazine issue that produces award-winning features on selected attorneys. Congratulations to this talented group: Super Lawyers of 2023 David A. Frenznick Steven J. Williamson Matthew W. Powell Daniel L. Egan George A. Guthrie Michael G. Polis Daniel J. Foster Stephen K. Marmaduke Neal C. Lutterman Trevor L. Stapleton Ronald R. Lamb Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Wilke Fleury LLP

    United States Supreme Court Backtracks on Recent Trajectory Away from Assertions of General Jurisdiction in Mallory v. Norfolk Southern

    August 01, 2023 —
    Washington, D.C. (June 28, 2023) – On June 27, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a sharply divided opinion that appears to backtrack on the Court’s steady trajectory away from assertions of general jurisdiction in recent years, e.g. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011), Daimler AG v. Bauman, 134 S. Ct. 746 (2014), BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell, 2017, 137 S. Ct. 1549 (2017). Relying on a case from 1917, Pennsylvania Fire Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. Gold Issue Mining & Milling Co., 243 U. S. 93 (1917), Justice Gorsuch, writing on behalf of the plurality, (Justices Gorsuch, Thomas, Sotomayor, and Jackson) (Justice Alito concurring) found that Norfolk Southern “consented” to jurisdiction in Mallory via 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. §5301(a)(2)(i),(b) by registering to do business in Pennsylvania. This statute, 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. §5301, specifically permits jurisdiction over a corporation “incorporat[ed] under or qualifi[ed]as a foreign corporation under the laws of this Commonwealth … for any cause of action that may asserted against him, whether or not arising from acts enumerated in this section.” In Pennsylvania Fire, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution in connection with a Missouri law that required an out-of-state insurance company desiring to transact any business in the state to file paperwork agreeing to (1) appoint a state official to serve as the company’s agent for service of process and (2) accept service on that official as valid in any suit. After more than a decade of complying with the law, Pennsylvania Fire was served with process and argued that the Missouri law violated due process. The Court unanimously found that there was “no doubt” that Pennsylvania Fire could be sued in Missouri because it had agreed to accept service of process in Missouri on any suit as a condition of doing business there. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Charles S. Anderson, Lewis Brisbois
    Mr. Anderson may be contacted at Charles.Anderson@lewisbrisbois.com

    New Addition to the ASCE/SEI 7-22 Standard Protects Buildings from a 500-year Flood Event

    June 05, 2023 —
    Reston, VA — The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) released a new update to their most widely used standard today, ASCE/SEI 7-22 Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Building and Other Structures. As the increasing frequency of severe storms puts strain on communities across the globe, the design standard's new flood load provisions will protect against 500-year flood events, which is a significant improvement to the 100-year flood hazard referenced in the previous version. The update — which is available in a supplement as a free download — is a significant revision of the design provisions in Chapter 5 to strengthen building resilience against the flood hazard. The ASCE 7 national loading standard is an integral part of building codes in the United States and around the globe. "For more than 30 years, the ASCE 7 standard has been the authoritative source for the specification of minimum design loads and related criteria in the civil engineering community," said Tom Smith, ASCE Executive Director. "To ensure structures continue to be safe for the public, it is imperative that the standards we rely on are updated to account for emerging risks to the built environment. This Supplement is the most significant change to the standard's flood load provisions since the inception of ASCE 7 and will improve the safety and reliability of structures across the globe." ABOUT THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS Founded in 1852, the American Society of Civil Engineers represents more than 150,000 civil engineers worldwide and is America's oldest national engineering society. ASCE works to raise awareness of the need to maintain and modernize the nation's infrastructure using sustainable and resilient practices, advocates for increasing and optimizing investment in infrastructure, and improve engineering knowledge and competency. For more information, visit www.asce.org or www.infrastructurereportcard.org and follow us on Twitter, @ASCETweets and @ASCEGovRel.