BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    townhome construction expert witness Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska landscaping construction expert witness Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska condominium expert witness Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska condominiums expert witness Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska high-rise construction expert witness Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska tract home expert witness Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska casino resort expert witness Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska parking structure expert witness Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Medical building expert witness Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Subterranean parking expert witness Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska production housing expert witness Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska housing expert witness Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska mid-rise construction expert witness Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska multi family housing expert witness Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska hospital construction expert witness Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska industrial building expert witness Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska custom home expert witness Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska institutional building expert witness Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska low-income housing expert witness Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska concrete tilt-up expert witness Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska structural steel construction expert witness Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska office building expert witness Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska, Alaska

    Alaska Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB151 limits the damages that can be awarded in a construction defect lawsuit to the actual cost of fixing the defect and other closely related costs such as reasonable temporary housing expenses during the repair of the defect, any reduction in market value cause by the defect, and reasonable and necessary attorney fees.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Southern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0240
    PO Box 6291
    Ketchikan, AK 99901
    http://www.sealaskabuilders.com

    Northern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0225
    9085 Glacier Highway Ste 202
    Juneau, AK 99801
    http://www.seabia.com

    Kenai Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 0233
    PO Box 1753
    Kenai, AK 99611
    http://www.kenaipeninsulabuilders.com

    Home Builders Association of Alaska
    Local # 0200
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518
    http://www.buildersofalaska.com

    Home Builders Association of Anchorage
    Local # 0215
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518
    http://www.buildersofalaska.com

    Mat-Su Home Builders Association
    Local # 0230
    609 S KNIK GOOSE BAY RD STE G
    Wasilla, AK 99654
    http://www.matsuhomebuilders.com

    Interior Alaska Builders Association
    Local # 0235
    938 Aspen Street
    Fairbanks, AK 99709
    http://www.InteriorABA.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska

    Construction Defect Scam Tied to Organized Crime?

    President Trump Nullifies “Volks Rule” Regarding Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Recordkeeping Requirements

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Lisa M. Rolle, Eric D. Suben, and Justyn Verzillo Secure Dismissal of All Claims in a Premises Liability Case

    Housing-Related Spending Makes Up Significant Portion of GDP

    Your Contract is a Hodgepodge of Conflicting Proposals

    U.S. Government Bans Use of Mandatory Arbitration Agreements between Nursing Homes and Residents, Effective November 28, 2016

    Homeowner Loses Suit against Architect and Contractor of Resold Home

    Insured's Complaint for Breach of Contract and Bad Faith Adequately Pleads Consequential Damages

    Zillow Seen Dominating U.S. Home Searches with Trulia

    Drones Give Inspectors a Closer Look at Bridges

    Does the Russia Ukraine War Lead to a Consideration in Your Construction Contracts?

    Sub-Limit Restricts Insured's Flood Damage Recovery

    No Coverage Based Upon Your Prior Work Exclusion

    Now Available: Seyfarth’s 50 State Lien Law Notice Requirements Guide (2023-2024 Edition)

    Agile Project Management in the Construction Industry

    Colorado Federal Court Confirms Consequetial Property Damage, But Finds No Coverage for Subcontractor

    Wisconsin Federal Court Addresses Scope Of Appraisal Provision In Rental Dwelling Policy

    A New Lawsuit Might Change the Real Estate Industry Forever

    Denial of Coverage for Bulge in Wall Upheld

    NCDOT Aims to Reopen Helene-damaged Interstate 40 by New Year's Day

    Wendel Rosen’s Construction Practice Group Receives First Tier Ranking

    Court of Appeal Shines Light on Collusive Settlement Agreements

    Building with Recycled Plastics – Interview with Jeff Mintz of Envirolastech

    Nonresidential Construction Employment Expands in August, Says ABC

    How I Prevailed on a Remote Jury Trial

    Supreme Court Finds Insurance Coverage for Intentional (and Despicable) Act of Contractor’s Employee

    Elevators Take Sustainable Smart Cities to the Next Level

    2023 West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar

    Federal District Court Addresses Material Misrepresentation in First Party Property Damage Claim

    NY Supreme Court Rules City Not Liable for Defective Sidewalk

    Understand the Dispute Resolution Provision You Are Agreeing To

    What is an Alternative Dispute Resolution?

    Are You Ready For 2015?

    Locals Concerns over Taylor Swift’s Seawall Misdirected

    Over 70 Lewis Brisbois Attorneys Recognized in 4th Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America

    Construction Defect Bill Introduced in California

    "Abrupt Falling Down of Building or Part of Building" as Definition of Collapse Found Ambiguous

    Differing Rulings On Construction Defect Claims Leave Unanswered Questions For Builders, and Construction Practice Groups. Impact to CGL Carriers, General Contractors, Builders Remains Unclear

    Milwaukee's 25-Story Ascent Stacks Up as Tall Timber Role Model

    What Happens When a Secured Creditor Files a Late Claim in an Equity Receivership?

    Construction Managers, Are You Exposing Yourselves to Labor Law Liability?

    Despite Health Concerns, Judge Reaffirms Sentence for Disbarred Las Vegas Attorney

    Coyness is Nice. Just Not When Seeking a Default Judgment

    How Robotics Can Improve Construction and Demolition Waste Sorting

    Blog: Congress Strikes a Blow to President Obama’s “Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces” Executive Order 13673

    NYC Airports Get $500,000 Makeover Contest From Cuomo

    General Contractor Gets Fired [Upon] for Subcontractor’s Failure to Hire Apprentices

    Building Materials Price Increase Clause for Contractors and Subcontractors – Three Options

    Insurance Lawyers Recognized by JD Supra 2020 Readers' Choice Awards

    Bidders Shortlisted as Oroville Dam Work Schedule is Set
    Corporate Profile

    CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENT EXPERT WITNESS FORENSIC ARCHITECT EXPERT WITNESS ROOFING MEMBRANE EXPERT WITNESS FORT YUKON ALASKA ALASKA ALASKA ALASKA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than 4500 engineering, construction, and builders standard of care related expert designations, the Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska, Alaska Construction Expert Directory offers a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, real estate investment trusts, risk managers, owners, as well as a variety of municipalities and government offices. Utilizing captive assets which comprise licensed architects, registered professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, ICC Certified inspection and testing professionals, the firm brings a wealth of experience and local capabilities to Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska and the surrounding areas.

    Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska construction expert witness consultantConstruction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska construction claims expert witnessConstruction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska roofing and waterproofing expert witnessConstruction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska civil engineering expert witnessConstruction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska expert witnesses fenestrationConstruction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska delay claim expert witnessConstruction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska civil engineer expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Construction accident expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska, Alaska

    Changes to the Federal Rules – 2024

    November 18, 2024 —
    Unless Congress moves quickly, several amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Evidence will take effect December 1, 2024. Below is a brief description of the amendments. Rules of Evidence Rule 107 is a new rule. This rule addresses illustrative aids, stating that, if such aid helps the trier of fact to understand the evidence or an argument, a party may use the aid if its utility is not substantially outweighed by the danger of, among other things, unfair prejudice. As noted under the discussion of Rule 1006, below, an illustrative aid - offered only to help the trier of fact understand the evidence - is generally not admissible into evidence. Rule 613 currently states that extrinsic evidence of a witness’s prior inconsistent statement is admissible only if the witness is given an opportunity to explain or deny the statement and the adverse party is given an opportunity to examine the witness about it, or if justice so requires. As amended, the court has the discretion to forego this requirement. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of William L. Doerler, White and Williams LLP
    Mr. Doerler may be contacted at doerlerw@whiteandwilliams.com

    In Appellate Division First, New York Appellate Team Successfully Invokes “Party Finality” Doctrine to Obtain Dismissal of Appeal for Commercial Guarantors

    December 23, 2024 —
    New York, N.Y. (November 20, 2024) - In Roc-Le Triomphe Associates, LLC v. DeSouza, 2024 NY Slip Op 05654 (1st Dep’t 2024), Associate Dean Pillarella, a member of the Appellate Practice, successfully invoked the party finality doctrine to obtain the dismissal of an appeal for the firm’s commercial guarantor clients. The action concerned rent allegedly due and owing under a commercial lease by the lease’s tenant and guarantors. Pursuant to a 2022 order, the guarantors were awarded summary judgment and dismissal of all claims against them, with the landlord’s claims against the tenant left intact. After the decision and order was served with notice of entry by the prevailing party, the landlord did not file a notice of appeal from the order but, instead, filed a notice of appeal from a later judgment months after the time to appeal the order had expired. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dean Pillarella, Lewis Brisbois
    Mr. Pillarella may be contacted at Dean.Pillarella@lewisbrisbois.com

    Newport Beach Partners Jeremy Johnson, Courtney Serrato, and Associate Joseph Real Prevailed on a Demurrer in a Highly Publicized Shooting Case!

    November 11, 2024 —
    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara’s Partners Jeremy Johnson, Courtney Serrato, and Associate Joseph Real prevailed on a Demurrer in a highly publicized shooting case. Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit alleging negligence, negligent hiring, supervision and retention, and public nuisance against BWB&O’s clients, a highly recognized hospitality and lifestyle company with nightlife and restaurant venues, in addition to other celebrity defendants. Plaintiffs were the victims of a shooting that occurred by an unknown individual(s) outside and near the restaurant/venue owned by BWB&O’s clients. Plaintiffs alleged it was BWB&O’s clients that were responsible for the third parties’ criminal acts because BWB&O’s clients attracted more people than the venue’s capacity, causing people to occupy the street, sidewalk, and property nearby. Plaintiffs further alleged that BWB&O’s client should have anticipated or known that criminal conduct, including gun violence, would take place. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Forum Selection Provisions Are Not to Be Overlooked…Even On Federal Projects

    September 16, 2024 —
    Forum selection provisions are NOT to be overlooked. Ever. Treat them seriously. Even on federal projects where there is a Miller Act payment bond. Consider forum selection provisions on the front end when negotiating your contract. In a recent opinion, U.S. f/u/b/o Timberline Construction Group, LLC vs. Aptim Federal Services, LLC, 2024 WL 3597164 (M.D.Fla. 2024), a joint venture prime contractor was hired by the federal government to build a temporary housing site. The joint venture prime contractor obtained a Miller Act payment bond. The joint venture then entered into a subcontract with one of its joint venture members and the member-subcontractor then engaged a sub-subcontractor. The sub-subcontractor claimed it was owed $3.5 Million and sued the member-subcontractor, as well as the prime contractor’s Miller Act payment bond, in the Middle District of Florida. The member-subcontractor and the Miller Act payment bond sureties moved to transfer venue to the Middle District of Louisiana pursuant to a forum selection clause in the contract between the sub-subcontractor and the member-subcontractor. The contract provided that the exclusive venue would be a United States District Court located in Louisiana. Forum selection provisions are analyzed in federal court under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a): “For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought or to any district or division to which all parties have consented.” U.S. f/u/b/o Timberline, supra at *2. A forum selection provision is presumptively valid and given controlling weight. Id. (quotations and citations omitted). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris, P.A.
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Is the Construction Industry Actually a Technology Hotbed?

    August 19, 2024 —
    Technology has always been a driving force behind progress, and the construction industry is no exception. Over the years, technological advancements have revolutionized the way companies design, plan and build structures, leading to increased efficiency, safety and sustainability. From virtual-reality simulations to drones and 3D printing, technology has transformed every aspect of the construction process. However, the construction trades still lag behind other sectors in adoption of digital technologies. With a lack of skilled labor continuing to be an impediment to growth and profitability in the construction industry, technological developments could have significant implications for successful adopters. Already, the industry is seeing a huge difference in valuation between traditional engineering and construction firms and construction software companies. As labor shortages continue to hinder growth in the industry, consolidation is likely, as is the probability that companies with the greatest tech capabilities will be the most highly valued. There are several areas of technology that are of the greatest interest in the current marketplace. BIM Building information modeling with computer-aided design software now allows architects and engineers to create detailed and accurate 3D models of buildings and infrastructure projects, integrating data about every aspect of the building, from materials and costs to energy efficiency and maintenance schedules. These models not only help in visualizing the final product; they also enable better communication and collaboration among project stakeholders. Reprinted courtesy of Andrew Silver, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Deferred Maintenance?

    December 17, 2024 —
    A Tennessee-based “outsourced maintenance vendor” to an engine company filed suit in Louisiana state court seeking to recover nearly $150,000 on “open account,” for work previously performed. The engine company removed the case to the Federal District Court in New Orleans and asserted as a defense that the vendor lacked a proper Louisiana construction contractor’s license. The engine company filed a motion for summary judgment based on the defense. Under Louisiana law, a contract between parties is “absolutely null”--considered to have never existed--where one of the parties performed services without a required Louisiana contractor’s license, and the combined work reaches a $50,000 threshold. The engine company asserted that the vendor performed typical construction contractor work, including plywood flooring, applied epoxy to concrete flooring, erected part of a commercial carport, undertook certain heavy demolition, and installed fences, guardrails, and wire racks. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Daniel Lund III, Phelps
    Mr. Lund may be contacted at daniel.lund@phelps.com

    ASCE Statement on Senate Passage of the Water Resources Development Act of 2024

    August 12, 2024 —
    WASHINGTON — The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) commends the Senate for passing S. 4367, the Thomas R. Carper Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 2024. Both the House and Senate versions of WRDA will help improve America's ports and inland waterways, enhance flood risk management and storm risk reduction programs, and prioritize ecosystem restoration. ASCE now urges Congress to swiftly conference and pass a final WRDA bill in the upcoming months. The Senate version of WRDA includes key provisions that will help ensure the ongoing operation of America's inland waterways systems, which received a 'D+' on the 2021 Report Card for America's Infrastructure, including adjustments to the cost share requirements for rehabilitation projects that receive funding the Inland Waterways Trust Fund (IWTF). These changes will ensure the IWTF remains available for future projects to help reduce the backlog of inland waterways projects. This bill also creates a Levee Owners Advisory Board, which has the potential to improve communication between the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, other federal agencies, and levee owners and operators. Now that the House and Senate have passed their versions of WRDA, we encourage lawmakers to include several provisions included in the House version in their final conference bill. This includes the reauthorization of the National Dam Safety Program through 2028, provisions that reduce restrictions on the amount of funds states can receive in National Dam Safety Program State Assistance Grants; improves access to the High Hazard Potential Dam Rehabilitation Grant Program; and requires the incorporation of low-head dams into the National Inventory of Dams, and an extension of the National Levee Safety program through 2033. ABOUT THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS Founded in 1852, the American Society of Civil Engineers represents more than 160,000 civil engineers worldwide and is America's oldest national engineering society. ASCE works to raise awareness of the need to maintain and modernize the nation's infrastructure using sustainable and resilient practices, advocates for increasing and optimizing investment in infrastructure, and improve engineering knowledge and competency. For more information, visit www.asce.org or www.infrastructurereportcard.org and follow us on Twitter, @ASCETweets and @ASCEGovRel.

    Insured Fails to Provide Adequate Proof of Water Damage Through Roof

    December 10, 2024 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer's motion for summary judgment due on the insured's claims for water damage to a church. Unity Church of God in Christ of York v. Church Mutual Ins. Co., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163204 (M.D. Pa. Sept. 11, 2024). Unity Church alleged that it suffered a sudden and accidental direct physical loss to its church. Wind damage to the roof of the church allowed rainwater to leak into the sanctuary of the church. Notice was given to Church Mutual Insurance Company, but coverage was denied. Unity Church filed suit alleging breach of contract. Church Mutual answered and asserted a counterclaim for a declaratory judgment that the water damage to the church was outside the policy's coverage because the damage was caused by rain. Church Mutual filed for summary judgment. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com