BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    mid-rise construction expert witness General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska custom homes expert witness General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska hospital construction expert witness General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska housing expert witness General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska multi family housing expert witness General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska landscaping construction expert witness General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska townhome construction expert witness General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska high-rise construction expert witness General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska retail construction expert witness General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska custom home expert witness General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska condominiums expert witness General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska parking structure expert witness General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska production housing expert witness General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska low-income housing expert witness General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska office building expert witness General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska condominium expert witness General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska industrial building expert witness General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska tract home expert witness General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Subterranean parking expert witness General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Medical building expert witness General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska institutional building expert witness General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska structural steel construction expert witness General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska, Alaska

    Alaska Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB151 limits the damages that can be awarded in a construction defect lawsuit to the actual cost of fixing the defect and other closely related costs such as reasonable temporary housing expenses during the repair of the defect, any reduction in market value cause by the defect, and reasonable and necessary attorney fees.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Southern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0240
    PO Box 6291
    Ketchikan, AK 99901
    http://www.sealaskabuilders.com

    Northern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0225
    9085 Glacier Highway Ste 202
    Juneau, AK 99801
    http://www.seabia.com

    Kenai Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 0233
    PO Box 1753
    Kenai, AK 99611
    http://www.kenaipeninsulabuilders.com

    Home Builders Association of Alaska
    Local # 0200
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518
    http://www.buildersofalaska.com

    Home Builders Association of Anchorage
    Local # 0215
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518
    http://www.buildersofalaska.com

    Mat-Su Home Builders Association
    Local # 0230
    609 S KNIK GOOSE BAY RD STE G
    Wasilla, AK 99654
    http://www.matsuhomebuilders.com

    Interior Alaska Builders Association
    Local # 0235
    938 Aspen Street
    Fairbanks, AK 99709
    http://www.InteriorABA.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska

    Construction of World's Tallest Building to Resume With New $1.9B Contract for Jeddah Tower

    A Tort, By Any Other Name, is Just a Tort: Massachusetts Court Bars Contract Claims That Sound in Negligence

    Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Kept Climbing in January

    Efficient Proximate Cause Applies to Policy's Collapse Provisions

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Ursinus is Cleared!”

    David A. Frenznick Awarded Multiple Accolades in the 2020 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America

    CISA Guidance 3.1: Not Much Change for Construction

    Key Legal Considerations for Modular Construction Contracts

    Eighth Circuit Affirms Judgment for Bad Faith after Insured's Home Destroyed by Fire

    The Utility of Arbitration Agreements in the Construction Industry

    What’s in a Name? Trademarks and Construction

    Balancing Cybersecurity Threats in Smart Cities: Is the Potential Convenience of “Smart” Intersections Worth the Risk?

    AGC’s 2024 Construction Outlook. Infrastructure is Bright but Office-Geddon is Not

    Three Reasons Late Payments Persist in the Construction Industry

    Biden Administration Issues Buy America Guidance for Federal Infrastructure Funds

    2024 Update to CEB’s Mechanics Liens Now Available

    Incorporation by Reference in Your Design Services Contract– What Does this Mean, and Are You at Risk? (Law Note)

    Properly Trigger the Performance Bond

    Using the Prevention Doctrine

    Conn. Appellate Court Overturns Jury Verdict, Holding Plaintiff’s Sole Remedy for Injuries Arising From Open Manhole Was State’s Highway Defect Statute

    Insurer Awarded Summary Judgment on Collapse Claim

    Port Authority Reaches Deal on Silverstein 3 World Trade

    Legislative Update: Bid Protest Law Changes to Benefit Contractors

    Construction Mezzanine Financing

    NYC Hires Engineer LERA for Parking Garage Collapse Probe

    Undocumented Debris at Mississippi Port Sparks Legal Battle

    Calling Hurricanes a Category 6 Risks Creating Deadly Confusion

    Ahead of the Storm: Preparing for Dorian

    15 Wilke Fleury Lawyers Recognized in 2020 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

    Century Communities Acquires Dunhill Homes Las Vegas Operations

    City Wonders Who’s to Blame for Defective Wall

    There Is No Sympathy If You Fail to Read Closely the Final Negotiated Construction Contract

    New World Cup Stadiums Failed at their First Trial

    Pulling the Plug

    N.J. Governor Fires Staff at Authority Roiled by Patronage Hires

    Industry News: New Partner at Burdman Law Group

    Florida District Court Finds That “Unrelated” Design Errors Sufficient to Trigger “Related Claims” Provision in Architects & Engineers Policy

    The G2G Mid-Year Roundup (2022)

    Napa Quake Seen Costing Up to $4 Billion as Wineries Shut

    Crossrail Audit Blames Busted Budget and Schedule on Mismanagement

    How To Lock Disputes Out Of Your Project In Construction

    Prison Contractors Did Not Follow the Law

    You Can Take This Job and Shove It!

    Mississippi Sues Over Public Health Lab Defects

    St Louis County Approves Settlement in Wrongful Death Suit

    Damage Control: Major Rebuilds After Major Weather Events

    Owners Should Serve Request for Sworn Statement of Account on Lienor

    General Liability Alert: A Mixed Cause of Action with Protected and Non-Protected Activity Not Subject to Anti-SLAPP Motion

    Insurer Ordered to Participate in Appraisal

    The Colorado Construction Defect Reform Act Explained
    Corporate Profile

    GENERAL CONTRACTING EXPERT WITNESS CERAMIC TILE EXPERT WITNESS FORENSIC ARCHITECT EXPERT WITNESS ROOFING MEMBRANE EXPERT WITNESS FORT YUKON ALASKA ALASKA ALASKA ALASKA ALASKA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over four thousand building and construction related expert designations, the General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska, Alaska Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides building claims investigation, testimony, and support services to widely recognized construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house resources which include licensed general and specialty contractors, consulting civil engineers, NCARB certified architects, roofing, and building envelope experts, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska and the surrounding areas.

    General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska window expert witnessGeneral contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska expert witness commercial buildingsGeneral contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska ada design expert witnessGeneral contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska construction claims expert witnessGeneral contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska eifs expert witnessGeneral contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska forensic architectGeneral contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska slope failure expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    General contracting expert witness Ceramic tile expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska, Alaska

    Think Before you Execute that Release – the Language in the Release Matters!

    June 17, 2024 —
    If you execute a release in exchange for payment or other consideration, remember the language in the release means something. THE RELEASE LANGUAGE MATTERS! And the meaning in the release may be way more than you intended so please make sure you truly digest and consider release language before executing. This sentiment could not be truer than in the 2009 decision Bell BCI Company v. United States, 570 F.3d 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2009). In this case, a contractor entered into a modification (change order) with the government. The modification included the following language: increase the contract amount by $2,296,963 … as full and equitable adjustment for the remaining direct and indirect costs of the Floor 4 Fit-out (EWO 240–R1) and full and equitable adjustment for all delays resulting from any and all Government changes transmitted to the Contractor on or before August 31, 2000. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris, P.A.
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Insured Fails to Provide Adequate Proof of Water Damage Through Roof

    December 10, 2024 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer's motion for summary judgment due on the insured's claims for water damage to a church. Unity Church of God in Christ of York v. Church Mutual Ins. Co., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163204 (M.D. Pa. Sept. 11, 2024). Unity Church alleged that it suffered a sudden and accidental direct physical loss to its church. Wind damage to the roof of the church allowed rainwater to leak into the sanctuary of the church. Notice was given to Church Mutual Insurance Company, but coverage was denied. Unity Church filed suit alleging breach of contract. Church Mutual answered and asserted a counterclaim for a declaratory judgment that the water damage to the church was outside the policy's coverage because the damage was caused by rain. Church Mutual filed for summary judgment. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    What Every Project Participant Needs to Know About Delay Claims

    August 05, 2024 —
    A “delay” on a construction project is defined as the stretching out of the time for completion of certain key milestone scopes of work which can impact the completion date of an entire project, due to some circumstances or events that were not reasonably anticipated when the project began. 2 Construction Law ¶ 6.01 (Matthew Bender, 2024). While delays can be caused by any number of events, the most common are defective plans and specifications; design changes; severe weather and other, similar unforeseeable events; unforeseen or differing site conditions; unavailability of materials or labor; labor inefficiencies or stoppages; contractor negligence; and owner influences, including construction changes or outright interference by the owner or its agents. If the project schedule is not recovered following a delay, then the project schedule will likely be extended, resulting in an increase in the contractor’s costs of performance. A contractor that has experienced a delay on a project can take certain actions to pursue recovery of any damages the contractor may have incurred. However, to do so it is important to understand the different types of delays and the methods for establishing the delays. I. Types of Delays Delays may be categorized as (1) critical versus non-critical delays, (2) excusable versus non-excusable delays, and (3) compensable versus non-compensable delays. A critical delay is a delay that affects the project completion date and delays the entire project. In essence, a critical delay is one that will extend the critical path of a project. A non-critical delay is a delay that has no effect on the project’s critical path. Courts have recognized that delays to work not on the critical path will generally not delay the completion of a project. G.M. Shupe, Inc. v U.S., 5 Cl. Ct. 662, 728 (1984). Such a non-critical delay may affect the completion of certain activities, but does not affect the completion date of the entire project. In order for a delay to provide the basis for a claim for additional time or money, the delay must impact critical path activities on the project schedule. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Andrew G. Vicknair, D'Arcy Vicknair, LLC
    Mr. Vicknair may be contacted at agv@darcyvicknair.com

    Developers Can Tap into DOE’s $400 Million for Remote and Rural Clean Energy Projects

    December 10, 2024 —
    On October 3, 2024, the Department of Energy Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations announced a Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) to fund up to $400 million for clean energy projects in rural and remote areas via its Energy Improvements in Rural or Remote Areas program. The NOFO will provide awards ranging from $2 million – $50 million, with plans to fund 20 to 50 projects. Awards will require a non-federal cost share, range across four topic areas, and target projects in rural and remote communities with populations of 10,000 people or fewer. Eligibility Applications are open to a wide range of entities, including for-profit and nonprofit organizations, state and local governmental entities, Indian Tribes and Tribal organizations, institutions of higher education, rural electric cooperatives, incorporated and unincorporated consortia, farming associations and cooperatives, and labor unions. Generally applicants must be U.S. entities, but foreign entities may be allowed to participate in limited circumstances. Applicants must identify at least one area in the U.S. or U.S. territories with a population of up to 10,000 people which will benefit from the proposal. Reprinted courtesy of Robert A. James, Pillsbury, Elina Teplinsky, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury, Sidney L. Fowler, Pillsbury and Clarence H. Tolliver, Pillsbury Mr. James may be contacted at rob.james@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Teplinsky may be contacted at elina.teplinsky@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Fowler may be contacted at sidney.fowler@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Tolliver may be contacted at clarence.tolliver@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Protecting Expert Opinions: Lessons Regarding Attorney-Client Privilege and Expert Retention in Construction Litigation

    August 19, 2024 —
    The Hill Hotel Owner LLC v. Hanover Insurance Company case has garnered attention due to its implications on the scope of attorney-client privilege in construction litigation. This blog post delves into the project’s background, the ensuing litigation, and the intricate work undertaken by attorneys and experts, highlighting the potential pitfalls associated with assumptions about privilege protections. Background of the Project Hill Hotel Owner LLC initiated a construction project in Boulder, Colorado, which included building a basement-level parking garage with an 18” thick concrete slab floor. The project utilized “void form,” a cardboard underlayment intended to create a gap between the foundation and the underlying soil. Unfortunately, the void form became wet and collapsed under the weight of the fresh concrete, causing considerable damage, and necessitating millions of dollars in remediation costs. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    Crisis Averted! Pennsylvania Supreme Court Joins Other Courts in Finding that Covid-19 Presents No Physical Loss or Damage for Businesses

    October 21, 2024 —
    Seeking to find some relief from business losses experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic, many businesses turned to their property insurers for coverage for their lost income. A clear national trend emerged among courts deciding the issue, as most businesses could not establish coverage because they had not experienced a “direct physical loss of or damage to their covered property” as required by most policies. While this legal question may have become an afterthought for many attorneys, the question remained an open one in Pennsylvania while the Pennsylvania Supreme Court considered two contradictory holdings issued in the Superior Court on this topic. Compare Macmiles, LLC v. Erie Ins. Exch., 286 A.3d 331 (Pa. Super. 2022) (holding there was no coverage for loss of use of a commercial property unaccompanied by any physical alteration or other physical condition that rendered the property unusable or uninhabitable) with Ungarean v. CNA, 286 A.3d 353 (Pa. Super. 2022) (holding that the policy at issue was ambiguous and therefore the policy covered the insured for COVID-related business losses). Last week, the Supreme Court considered the Superior Court’s holdings in Macmiles and Ungarean and held, at long last, that COVID-19 did not cause a direct physical loss of or damage to covered property. Reprinted courtesy of Edward M. Koch, White and Williams LLP and Marc L. Penchansky, White and Williams LLP Mr. Koch may be contacted at koche@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Penchansky may be contacted at penchanskym@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (6/26/24) – Construction Growth in Office and Data Center Sectors, Slight Ease in Consumer Price Index and Increased Premiums for Commercial Buildings

    July 22, 2024 —
    In our latest roundup, U.S. interest rates remain uncertain, construction firms continue to use artificial intelligence, New York City updates commercial zoning regulations, and more!
    • According to analysts, high vacancy rates and declining rents have hurt San Francisco’s office market so badly that it could take almost 20 years to recover. (Eric McConnell, Yahoo)
    • The New York City Council approved updated commercial zoning regulations that expand where businesses can be located in the city, more than double the space for small-scale clean manufacturing, and enable adaptive reuse projects involving existing buildings. (Joe Burns, Construction Dive)
    • The insurance industry is responding to the proliferation of extreme weather events and the risks associated with operating commercial buildings in vulnerable areas by increasing premiums. (Renea Burns, Tim Coy, Niall Williams, Deloitte)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    Recovering Time and Costs from Hurricane Helene: Force Majeure Solutions for Contractors

    November 18, 2024 —
    When Hurricane Helene struck North Carolina, it caused severe disruptions to construction projects across the state. Baxter International’s North Cove facility in Marion, N.C., was completely shut down after floodwaters damaged the site and bridges leading to it. Elsewhere, landslides and floods wiped out large sections of Interstate 40, making transportation of materials and equipment nearly impossible. Many contractors in western North Carolina found their projects halted, and their schedules thrown off by this force majeure event. In situations like these, contractors and subcontractor need a plan to mitigate the impact of such natural disasters on their projects. Here are five practical tips to help you secure time extensions and/or compensation for delays: 1. Include a Robust Force Majeure Clause in Your Contract When disaster strikes, your contract is your first line of defense. A well-drafted force majeure clause can make the difference between bearing the costs yourself and getting an extension or compensation. The clause should clearly list specific events such as hurricanes, floods, and road closures as qualifying force majeure events. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Matthew DeVries, Buchalter
    Mr. DeVries may be contacted at mdevries@buchalter.com