BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    production housing expert witness Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska condominiums expert witness Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska casino resort expert witness Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska custom homes expert witness Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska parking structure expert witness Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska office building expert witness Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska concrete tilt-up expert witness Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska structural steel construction expert witness Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska mid-rise construction expert witness Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska condominium expert witness Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Medical building expert witness Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska low-income housing expert witness Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Subterranean parking expert witness Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska hospital construction expert witness Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska institutional building expert witness Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska industrial building expert witness Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska retail construction expert witness Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska townhome construction expert witness Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska multi family housing expert witness Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska tract home expert witness Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska high-rise construction expert witness Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska custom home expert witness Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska, Alaska

    Alaska Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB151 limits the damages that can be awarded in a construction defect lawsuit to the actual cost of fixing the defect and other closely related costs such as reasonable temporary housing expenses during the repair of the defect, any reduction in market value cause by the defect, and reasonable and necessary attorney fees.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Southern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0240
    PO Box 6291
    Ketchikan, AK 99901
    http://www.sealaskabuilders.com

    Northern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0225
    9085 Glacier Highway Ste 202
    Juneau, AK 99801
    http://www.seabia.com

    Kenai Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 0233
    PO Box 1753
    Kenai, AK 99611
    http://www.kenaipeninsulabuilders.com

    Home Builders Association of Alaska
    Local # 0200
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518
    http://www.buildersofalaska.com

    Home Builders Association of Anchorage
    Local # 0215
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518
    http://www.buildersofalaska.com

    Mat-Su Home Builders Association
    Local # 0230
    609 S KNIK GOOSE BAY RD STE G
    Wasilla, AK 99654
    http://www.matsuhomebuilders.com

    Interior Alaska Builders Association
    Local # 0235
    938 Aspen Street
    Fairbanks, AK 99709
    http://www.InteriorABA.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska

    How Long does a Florida Condo Association Have to File a Construction Defect Claim?

    General Partner Is Not Additional Insured For Construction Defect Claim

    Judgment for Insured Upheld After Insurer Rejects Claim for Hurricane Damage

    Bert L. Howe & Associates Brings Professional Development Series to Their Houston Office

    Is Arbitration Always the Answer?

    Application Of Two Construction Contract Provisions: No-Damages-For-Delay And Liquidated Damages

    Subcontractor’s Claim against City Barred by City’s Compliance with Georgia Payment Bond Statute

    Texas Condo Construction Defect Code Amended

    Construction Goes Green in Orange County

    Nuclear Energy Gets a Much-Needed Boost

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2022 New York – Metro Super Lawyers®

    Drill Rig Accident Kills Engineering Manager, Injures Operator in Philadelphia

    Dump Site Provider Has Valid Little Miller Act Claim

    Insured's Collapse Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    When Every Drop Matters, Cities Turn to Watertech

    Consequential Damages From Subcontractor's Faulty Work Constitutes "Property Damage" and An "Occurrence"

    Legislative Update – The CSLB’s Study Under SB465

    Tesla Powerwalls for Home Energy Storage Hit U.S. Market

    Lithium for Batteries from Geothermal Brine

    Changes in the Law on Lien Waivers

    California MCLE Seminar at BHA Sacramento July 11th

    “Rip and Tear” Damage Remains Covered Under CGL Policy as “Accident”—for Now.

    Judge Gives Cintra Bid Protest of $9B Md. P3 Project Award New Life

    Allegations of Actual Property Damage Necessary to Invoke Duty to Defend

    Are Millennials Finally Moving Out On Their Own?

    Former SNC-Lavalin CEO Now Set for Trial in Bribe Case

    Five New Laws to Know Before They Take Effect On Jan. 1, 2022

    Thank You for 18 Straight Years in the Virginia Legal Elite in Construction Law

    The Overlooked Nevada Rule In an Arena Project Lawsuit

    Nation’s Top Court Limits EPA's Authority in Clean Air Case

    How Mushrooms Can Be Used To Make Particle Board Less Toxic

    The Conscious Builder – Interview with Casey Grey

    Providing Your Insurer Prompt Notice

    Assignment of Construction Defect Claims Not Covered

    Lump Sum Subcontract? Perhaps Not.

    Dear Engineer: Has your insurer issued a “Reservation of Rights” letter? (law note)

    Floating Cities May Be One Answer to Rising Sea Levels

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC Recognized Among The Top 50 Construction Law Firms by Construction Executive

    Accident/Occurrence Requirement Does not Preclude Coverage for Vicarious Liability or Negligent Supervision

    Celebrating Dave McLain’s Recognition in the Best Lawyers in America® 2025

    White and Williams Earns National "Best Law Firm" Rankings from US News

    New Pedestrian, Utility Bridge Takes Shape on Everett Waterfront

    Domingo Tan Receives Prestigious Ollie Award: Excellence in Construction Defect Community

    Showdown Over Landmark Housing Law Looms at U.S. Supreme Court

    2021 Executive Insights: Leaders in Construction Law

    New Research Shows Engineering Firms' Impact on Economy, Continued Optimism on Business Climate

    First Suit to Enforce Business-Interruption Coverage Filed

    Singapore Unveils Changes to Make Public Housing More Affordable

    Biden Unveils $2.3 Trillion American Jobs Plan

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “A Close Call?”
    Corporate Profile

    HOSPITAL EXPERT WITNESS MECHANICAL ENGINEERING EXPERT WITNESS FORENSIC ARCHITECT EXPERT WITNESS ROOFING MEMBRANE EXPERT WITNESS FORT YUKON ALASKA ALASKA ALASKA ALASKA ALASKA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately five thousand construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska, Alaska Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides building claims investigation, testimony, and support services to widely recognized construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house resources which include building envelope experts, forensic architects, professional engineers, credentialed construction standard of care consultants, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska region.

    Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska construction expert witnessesHospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska hospital construction expert witnessHospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska reconstruction expert witnessHospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska building code expert witnessHospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska expert witness windowsHospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska construction defect expert witnessHospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska delay claim expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Hospital expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Forensic architect expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Alaska, Alaska

    Deferred Maintenance?

    December 17, 2024 —
    A Tennessee-based “outsourced maintenance vendor” to an engine company filed suit in Louisiana state court seeking to recover nearly $150,000 on “open account,” for work previously performed. The engine company removed the case to the Federal District Court in New Orleans and asserted as a defense that the vendor lacked a proper Louisiana construction contractor’s license. The engine company filed a motion for summary judgment based on the defense. Under Louisiana law, a contract between parties is “absolutely null”--considered to have never existed--where one of the parties performed services without a required Louisiana contractor’s license, and the combined work reaches a $50,000 threshold. The engine company asserted that the vendor performed typical construction contractor work, including plywood flooring, applied epoxy to concrete flooring, erected part of a commercial carport, undertook certain heavy demolition, and installed fences, guardrails, and wire racks. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Daniel Lund III, Phelps
    Mr. Lund may be contacted at daniel.lund@phelps.com

    68 Lewis Brisbois Attorneys Recognized in 5th Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America

    September 23, 2024 —
    (August 15, 2024) – 68 Lewis Brisbois attorneys across 26 offices have been named to the 5th edition of “Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America.” Congratulations to the following attorneys on this recognition! You can see the list of Lewis Brisbois attorneys named to Best Lawyers' 30th edition of The Best Lawyers in America here. Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois Read the full story...

    Will the AI Frenzy Continue in 2025?

    January 14, 2025 —
    In AEC technology, 2024 was undoubtedly the year of AI. Every company seemed to announce its pledge to embrace artificial intelligence in the coming years, not to mention the numerous startups that peppered their pitch decks with promises of bleeding-edge innovation. Tech developers who had been using machine learning before the generative AI boom were delighted. They no longer needed to invest significant resources in convincing the industry of AI’s potential. The mainstream success of generative AI in 2024 created a ripple effect, making AEC firms eager to explore and adopt AI solutions. Many all-digital startups also got a boost from the AI frenzy, even though many significant innovations happened in hardware and material technology that did not rely on AI. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Toolbox Talk Series Recap - The Mediator's Proposal

    January 21, 2025 —
    In our final edition of the year of Division 1's Toolbox Talk Series on December 19, 2024, Matthew Argue and Gene Witkin discussed the use of the Mediator’s Proposal to bridge any final gaps to settlement between parties to a mediation. For those unfamiliar, a Mediator’s Proposal is a settlement proposal that the mediator makes to all parties to the dispute simultaneously. Each party then advises the mediators in confidence whether they accept or reject the proposal. The Mediator will communicate to all the parties that the Mediator’s Proposal is accepted only if all parties accept. Argue and Witkin emphasized that the Mediator’s Proposal is not a shortcut and should not be used simply to split the difference. Instead, it is a tool available to the mediator to push the parties to resolution after they have had robust negotiations, understand the strengths and weaknesses of the positions of each side, and have made progress towards at least getting within range of one another. A successful Mediator’s Proposal depends on the mediator (and the parties) having sufficient information to make a credible recommendation and creating an environment where all parties will consider the Mediator’s Proposal in good faith. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Douglas J. Mackin, Cozen O’Connor
    Mr. Mackin may be contacted at dmackin@cozen.com

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (9/4/24) – DOJ Sues RealPage, Housing Sales Increase and U.S. Can’t Build Homes Fast Enough

    October 07, 2024 —
    In our latest roundup, environmental regulations tighten for commercial properties, Wells Fargo sells most of its commercial mortgage services business, first-time home buyers struggle with housing affordability, and more!
    • The U.S. Department of Justice announced that it is suing the real estate company RealPage, saying it engaged in a price-fixing scheme to drive up rents. (Jennifer Ludden, NPR)
    • As environmental regulations for commercial buildings and properties tighten across the U.S., green leases and technologies offer owners and operators opportunities to reduce their portfolios’ carbon footprints, generate cost savings and further align with ESG goals. (Nish Amarnath, Construction Dive)
    • Wells Fargo & Co. agreed to sell most of its commercial mortgage servicing business to Trimont LLC, ceding the title of biggest US commercial and multifamily mortgage servicer to the Atlanta-based firm. (Hannah Levitt and Scott Carpenter, Yahoo)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    Bright-Line Changes: Prompt Payment Act Trends

    September 16, 2024 —
    Untimely payment by the owner for contract work and additional work on construction projects can place an unfair financial burden on contractors and subcontractors. Most states have attempted to eliminate or mitigate this inequity in construction contracting through Prompt Payment Acts that govern payment deadlines and provide remedies for untimely payment. This article addresses the legislative trends aimed at minimizing the risk of non-payment, overdue payment, and withholding retainage in favor of downstream parties to a construction contract. Fortifying Contractor Protections with “Bright-Line” Language Over the last decade, states have been tightening prompt payment laws by replacing broad, general statutory language with bright-line rules. What is a bright-line rule? A specific or definite figure, a quantifiable marker—i.e., something owners, contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers should be aware of. Practically speaking, the more bright-line a prompt payment statute is, the greater the likelihood it will affect a construction project in your state. A standard form construction contract, if not reviewed carefully, can create conflicts or confusion if it gives a party more leeway on payment deadlines than the applicable Prompt Payment Act. For example, consider an owner-issued Construction Change Directive (“CCD”) that requires a contractor to commence additional work immediately while a formal change order is negotiated. Consequently, a CCD can push financial burdens downstream, whether inadvertently or not, and may conflict with statutory payment deadlines. Nevertheless, an owner can be justified in its utilization of a CCD to maintain the project schedule. How should the parties competing interests be resolved? Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Peckar & Abramson, P.C.

    Blog Completes Seventeenth Year

    January 07, 2025 —
    Insurance Law Hawaii reaches the end of its seventeenth year this month. We began posting long ago, in December 2007. We seek to keep readers apprised of developments in insurance-related cases from Hawaii and across the country. Coverage issues surrounding the Maui fires have been top of mind this year. We will continue posting on important coverage developments in the next year. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Robinson+Cole’s Amicus Brief Adopted and Cited by Massachusetts’s High Court

    July 31, 2024 —
    Earlier this year, the Associated Subcontractors of Massachusetts hired Robinson+Cole attorney Joseph Barra to submit an amicus brief to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court for consideration in the appeal pending before it in Business Interiors Floor Covering Business Trust v. Graycor Construction Co., Inc. In its June 17, 2024 decision in that case, the Court interpreted the Massachusetts Prompt Pay Act, which applies to private construction projects and “requires that parties to a construction contract approve or reject payment within” an allotted time period and in compliance with certain procedures else such payments will be deemed approved. Two years ago, the Massachusetts Appeals Court, in Tocci Building Corp. v. IRIV Partners, LLC, decided that an owner who fails to timely advise its general contractor of the reasons as to why it was withholding payment, coupled with failure to certify that such funds are being withheld in good faith, violates the Prompt Pay Act and makes the owner liable for funds owed.[1] However, the Tocci Building Court left open the question of whether one who violates the Prompt Pay Act forfeits its substantive defenses to non-payment, such as fraud, defective work, or breach of material obligation of the contract. The facts of Business Interiors involve a general contractor, Graycor, which subcontracted Business Interiors to perform certain flooring work for a movie theatre in Boston’s North End. When Graycor failed to formally approve, reject, or certify, in good faith, its withholding of payment of three of Business Interiors’ applications for payment as prescribed by the Prompt Pay Act, Business Interiors brought suit alleging, among other things, breach of contract. Business Interiors then moved for summary judgement arguing that Graycor’s failure to comply with the Act rendered it liable for the unpaid invoices. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Robinson + Cole