BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    landscaping construction expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska structural steel construction expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska office building expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska institutional building expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska casino resort expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska condominiums expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska multi family housing expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska concrete tilt-up expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Medical building expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska custom homes expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska townhome construction expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska hospital construction expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska parking structure expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska tract home expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska retail construction expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska housing expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska mid-rise construction expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska custom home expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska Subterranean parking expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska condominium expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska industrial building expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska production housing expert witness Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska, Alaska

    Alaska Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB151 limits the damages that can be awarded in a construction defect lawsuit to the actual cost of fixing the defect and other closely related costs such as reasonable temporary housing expenses during the repair of the defect, any reduction in market value cause by the defect, and reasonable and necessary attorney fees.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Southern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0240
    PO Box 6291
    Ketchikan, AK 99901
    http://www.sealaskabuilders.com

    Northern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0225
    9085 Glacier Highway Ste 202
    Juneau, AK 99801
    http://www.seabia.com

    Kenai Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 0233
    PO Box 1753
    Kenai, AK 99611
    http://www.kenaipeninsulabuilders.com

    Home Builders Association of Alaska
    Local # 0200
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518
    http://www.buildersofalaska.com

    Home Builders Association of Anchorage
    Local # 0215
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518
    http://www.buildersofalaska.com

    Mat-Su Home Builders Association
    Local # 0230
    609 S KNIK GOOSE BAY RD STE G
    Wasilla, AK 99654
    http://www.matsuhomebuilders.com

    Interior Alaska Builders Association
    Local # 0235
    938 Aspen Street
    Fairbanks, AK 99709
    http://www.InteriorABA.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska

    New Joint Venture to Develop a New Community in Orange County, California

    How Small Mistakes Can Have Serious Consequences Under California's Contractor Licensing Laws.

    My Employees Could Have COVID-19. What Now?

    Three Construction Workers Injured at Former GM Plant

    Massachusetts Clarifies When the Statute of Repose is Triggered For a Multi-Phase or Multi-Building Project

    Fix for Settling Millennium Tower May Start This Fall

    Apprentices on Public Works Projects: Sometimes it’s Not What You Do But Who You Do the Work For That Counts

    Poor Pleading Leads to Loss of Claim for Trespass Due to Relation-Back Doctrine, Statute of Limitations

    Professional Liability Alert: Joint Client Can't Claim Privilege For Communications With Attorney Sued By Another Joint Client

    DEP Plan to Deal with Noxious Landfill Fumes Met with Criticism

    ASCE Statement On White House "Accelerating Infrastructure Summit"

    The Air in There: Offices, and Issues, That Seem to Make Us Stupid

    Understand and Define Key Substantive Contract Provisions

    Hilary Soaks California With Flooding Rain and Snarls Flights

    Reasonableness of Denial of Requests for Admission Based Upon Expert’s Opinions Depends On Factors Within Party’s Understanding

    Single-Family Home Starts Seen Catching Up to Surging U.S. Sales

    Harmon Towers Demolition Still Uncertain

    Construction Defect Bill Introduced in California

    What Makes a Great Lawyer?

    New Proposed Regulations Expand CFIUS Jurisdiction Regarding Real Estate

    Here's How Much You Can Make by Renting Out Your Home

    Building Codes Evolve With High Wind Events

    OSHA Begins Enforcement of its Respirable Crystalline Silica in Construction Standard. Try Saying That Five Times Real Fast

    Paul Tetzloff Elected As Newmeyer & Dillion Managing Partner

    Federal Arbitration Act Preempts Pennsylvania Payment Act

    Look Up And Look Out: Increased Antitrust Enforcement Of Horizontal No-Poach Agreements Signals Heightened Scrutiny Of Vertical Agreements May Be Next

    Differing Rulings On Construction Defect Claims Leave Unanswered Questions For Builders, and Construction Practice Groups. Impact to CGL Carriers, General Contractors, Builders Remains Unclear

    Value In Being Deemed “Statutory Employer” Under Workers Compensation Law

    New York Office Secures Appellate Win in Labor Law 240(1) Fall in Basement Accident Case

    New York Court of Appeals Finds a Proximate Cause Standard in Additional Insured Endorsements

    Supreme Court of New York Denies Motion in all but One Cause of Action in Kikirov v. 355 Realty Assoc., et al.

    Senator Ray Scott Introduced a Bill to Reduce Colorado’s Statute of Repose for Construction Defect Actions to Four Years

    It Was a Wild Week for Just About Everyone. Ok, Make that Everyone.

    Cape Town Seeks World Cup Stadium Construction Collusion Damages

    Alaska District Court Sets Aside Rulings Under New Administration’s EO 13795

    The Jersey Shore gets Beach Prisms Designed to Reduce Erosion

    The G2G Year-End Roundup (2022)

    Nonresidential Construction Employment Expands in August, Says ABC

    Amazon Urged to Review Emergency Plans in Wake of Deadly Tornado

    Environmental Suit Against Lockheed Martin Dismissed

    New LG Headquarters Project Challenged because of Height

    I-35W Bridge Collapse may be Due to “Inadequate Load Capacity”

    Wildfire Smoke Threatens to Wipe Out Decades of Air Pollution Progress

    Payment Bond Claim Notice Requires More than Mailing

    Failure to Allege Property Damage Within Policy Period Defeats Insured's Claim

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Attorney Fee Award Under the Contractor and Subcontractor Payment Act

    Lenders and Post-Foreclosure Purchasers Have Standing to Make Construction Defect Claims for After-Discovered Conditions

    Voluntary Payments Affirmative Defense Does Not Apply in Contract Cases

    Testing Your Nail Knowledge

    Drones, Googleplexes and Hyperloops
    Corporate Profile

    MECHANICAL ENGINEERING EXPERT WITNESS ROOFING MEMBRANE EXPERT WITNESS FORT YUKON ALASKA ALASKA ALASKA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over four thousand construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska, Alaska Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to builders, risk managers, and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the nation's most recognized builders, risk managers, legal professionals, owners, state and local government agencies. Employing in house resources which comprise building envelope and design experts, forensic engineers, forensic architects, and construction cost and scheduling consultants, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska and the surrounding areas.

    Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska ada design expert witnessMechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska building expertMechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska construction expert witnessesMechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska construction claims expert witnessMechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska slope failure expert witnessMechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska construction defect expert witnessMechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska Alaska construction cost estimating expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Mechanical engineering expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Fort Yukon Alaska Alaska, Alaska

    Future Army Corps Rulings on Streams and Wetlands: Changes and Delays Ahead

    November 06, 2023 —
    New regulations published by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dramatically reduce federal protections of previously regulated streams and wetlands. This change will lead to further controversy and litigation as the legal terms are applied to physical features on the ground leading to conflicting interpretations by the regulated public, environmentalists and federal agencies. Reprinted courtesy of Mark Sudol, Engineering News-Record ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com Read the full story...

    11th Circuit Affirms Bad Faith Judgement Against Primary Insurer

    July 24, 2023 —
    In American Builders Insurance Co. v. Southern-Owners Ins. Co., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15386, No. 21-13496 (11th Cir. June 20, 2023), the Eleventh Circuit affirmed a bad faith judgment against a primary insurer. On April 1, 2019, Ernest Guthrie fell from a roof, causing him to became paralyzed from the waist down. At the time of the accident, Guthrie was employed by his own subcontracting company and was performing work for Beck Construction. Beck Construction was insured under a general liability policy issued by American Builders and an excess policy issued by Evanston. Each of those policies provided $1 million in liability limits. Guthrie’s company was insured under a policy issued by Southern-Owners, which provided a per occurrence limit of $1 million. Under the Southern-Owners policy, Beck Construction was an additional insured and coverage was provided to Beck Construction on a primary basis. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ashley Kellgren, Traub Lieberman
    Ms. Kellgren may be contacted at akellgren@tlsslaw.com

    New York Restrictions on Flow Through Provision in Subcontracts

    August 14, 2023 —
    Most subcontracts include a flow through provision (also called flow down and incorporation clauses) stating that the subcontractor and contractor are bound by the same obligations as set forth in the prime contract between the contractor and owner. Many jurisdictions interpret such provisions narrowly, as illustrated in a recent case out of New York. In Amerisure Insurance Company v. Selective Insurance Group, Inc., 2023 WL 3311879, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the District Court’s interpretation of a flow through clause in a construction subcontract. The Amerisure case involved a dispute over insurance coverage for a personal injury to a subcontractor’s employee on a construction project. The owner of the project sought defense and indemnity from the general contractor (GC) and its insurance company, who in turn sought coverage for the owner as an additional insured under the subcontractor’s policy. The GC based its argument for coverage on the flow through provision in the subcontract. The prime contract required the GC to procure commercial liability insurance including the owner as an additional insured for claims caused by the GC’s negligent acts or omissions. The subcontract likewise required the subcontractor to procure commercial general liability insurance but required only that the GC be named as an additional insured. However, the subcontract also included a flow through clause, binding the subcontractor to the terms of the prime contract and assuming toward the GC all the obligations and responsibilities that the GC assumed toward the owner. However, the subcontract did not expressly require that the subcontractor name the owner as an additional insured, and in order for the owner to qualify as an additional insured under the subcontractor’s insurance policy, the subcontractor must have agreed in the subcontract to name the owner as an additional insured. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bill Wilson, Robinson & Cole LLP
    Mr. Wilson may be contacted at wwilson@rc.com

    Navigating the Construction Burrito: OCIP Policies in California’s Construction Defect Cases

    November 16, 2023 —
    In the early 2000’s, Owner-Controlled Insurance Programs (OCIP) or WRAPS, were traditionally used in large commercial projects of over $50 million in construction costs. As construction defect lawsuits became more prevalent, subcontractors found themselves unable to meet the insurance requirements of their contracts with developers and general contractors because they could not find insurance companies that were willing to insure the risk. This presented a problem for developers and general contractors and left them with no option but to look into new insurance products that would insure them and all subcontractors who worked on the project. OCIPs became in some instances the only insurance option for developers, general contractors, and subcontractors to build single-family or multi-family projects in California and other western states. OCIPS or WRAPS, often likened to the layers of a savory burrito, offer both enticing benefits and potential pitfalls. Just as a burrito’s ingredients can harmonize or clash, OCIP policies can shape the outcome of legal battles, impacting contractors, developers, and insurers alike. Pros – Savoring the OCIP Burrito: 1. Wrapped Protection: Much like a well-folded burrito envelops its contents, OCIP policies offer comprehensive coverage for construction projects. Developers, general contractors, and subcontractors find comfort in knowing that their liability risks are bundled into a single policy, ensuring all enrolled parties have coverage in the event of a claim. Reprinted courtesy of Alexa Stephenson, Kahana Feld and Ivette Kincaid, Kahana Feld Ms. Stephenson may be contacted at astephenson@kahanafeld.com Ms. Kincaid may be contacted at ikincaid@kahanafeld.com Read the full story...

    Freight Train Carrying Hot Asphalt, Molten Sulfur Plunges Into Yellowstone River as Bridge Fails

    July 10, 2023 —
    Associated Press COLUMBUS, Mont. (AP) — A bridge that crosses the Yellowstone River in Montana collapsed early Saturday, plunging portions of a freight train carrying hazardous materials into the rushing water below. Reprinted courtesy of The Associated Press, Engineering News-Record Read the full story...

    Product Manufacturers Beware: You May Be Subject to Jurisdiction in Massachusetts

    July 05, 2023 —
    Say you are a Floridian product manufacturer that does business in Massachusetts and you receive a Complaint filed in Massachusetts that alleges your product injured a Nova Scotian resident in Nova Scotia. You know that the only time that product was in Massachusetts was during its transport up the eastern seaboard to its final destination at a retailer in Nova Scotia. Can you be hailed into a Massachusetts court for this accident? The answer is seemingly not so simple following the Supreme Judicial Court’s holding in Doucet v. FCA US LLC. On June 8th, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, in Doucet v. FCA US LLC, held that FCA US LLC is subject to jurisdiction in Massachusetts for a personal injury action arising out of a motor vehicle accident that occurred in New Hampshire. No. SJC-13354, slip. op. (Mass. June 8, 2023). The vehicle had been purchased in New Hampshire by a New Hampshire resident. The Court explained that federal due process does not require a causal connection between a company’s business dealings with the jurisdiction and the injury; instead, a mere relationship between the business dealings and the injury will suffice to establish jurisdiction. Because the vehicle at issue was first sold in Massachusetts and FCA US LLC had extensive business dealings unrelated to the vehicle in question in Massachusetts, the Court concluded that a strong enough relationship existed between FCA US LLC, Massachusetts, and the litigation for jurisdiction to exist. Reprinted courtesy of Timothy Keough, White and Williams LLP and Audrey Schoenike, White and Williams LLP Mr. Keough may be contacted at keought@whiteandwilliams.com Ms. Schoenike may be contacted at schoenikea@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    The Increasing Trend of Caps in Construction Contracts and Negotiating Them

    November 27, 2023 —
    Risks are inherent in every construction project and all parties involved face them: owners, designers, general contractors/builders, subcontractors, suppliers…. Equitably allocating such risks is one of the most important and most negotiated areas of any construction related contract. Limitations of liability provisions are key to risk allocation. These provisions include no damage for delay provisions and caps on delay damages, warranty limitations and exclusions, indemnity limitations, and consequential damage waivers. Another, and the focus of this article, is a liability cap fixing the total amount of damages for which a party may be liable under the contract (the “Liability Cap”). Liability Caps have become more and more common in construction and construction related contracts, including major component supply agreements and design agreements. This article will discuss Liability Caps generally and considerations of an owner or contractor negotiating them, including carve-outs (i.e. exceptions) to them. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jarred Trauth, Jones Walker LLP
    Mr. Trauth may be contacted at jtrauth@joneswalker.com

    Best Lawyers Recognizes Hundreds of Lewis Brisbois Attorneys, Honors Four Partners as ‘Lawyers of the Year’

    October 16, 2023 —
    (August 17, 2023) – Best Lawyers has selected 172 Lewis Brisbois attorneys across 46 offices for its 30th edition of The Best Lawyers in America. It has also recognized four Lewis Brisbois partners on its "Lawyers of the Year" list: Akron Managing Partner David Kern (Mergers and Acquisitions Law); Newark Partner Meredith Kaplan Stoma (Professional Malpractice Law - Defendants); Philadelphia Partner Steven D. Urgo (Litigation – Insurance); and Roanoke Managing Partner John T. Jessee (Medical Malpractice Law – Defendants). Please join us in congratulating the following attorneys on their Best Lawyers recognition! You can see the full list of attorneys named to Best Lawyers' Ones to Watch in America here. Akron, OH
    • Partner John F. Hill - Bet-the-Company Litigation, Commercial Litigation, Legal Malpractice Law – Defendants, and Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs
    • Partner Kerri Keller - Commercial Litigation
    • Managing Partner David Kern - Corporate Law, Mergers and Acquisitions Law, Tax Law, and Trusts and Estates
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois