BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska mid-rise construction expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska casino resort expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska townhome construction expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska multi family housing expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska condominiums expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska low-income housing expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska parking structure expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska condominium expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska institutional building expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska custom home expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska hospital construction expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska office building expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska production housing expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska high-rise construction expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska retail construction expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska housing expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska tract home expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska Subterranean parking expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska custom homes expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska landscaping construction expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska structural steel construction expert witness Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska, Alaska

    Alaska Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB151 limits the damages that can be awarded in a construction defect lawsuit to the actual cost of fixing the defect and other closely related costs such as reasonable temporary housing expenses during the repair of the defect, any reduction in market value cause by the defect, and reasonable and necessary attorney fees.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Southern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0240
    PO Box 6291
    Ketchikan, AK 99901
    http://www.sealaskabuilders.com

    Northern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0225
    9085 Glacier Highway Ste 202
    Juneau, AK 99801
    http://www.seabia.com

    Kenai Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 0233
    PO Box 1753
    Kenai, AK 99611
    http://www.kenaipeninsulabuilders.com

    Home Builders Association of Alaska
    Local # 0200
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518
    http://www.buildersofalaska.com

    Home Builders Association of Anchorage
    Local # 0215
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518
    http://www.buildersofalaska.com

    Mat-Su Home Builders Association
    Local # 0230
    609 S KNIK GOOSE BAY RD STE G
    Wasilla, AK 99654
    http://www.matsuhomebuilders.com

    Interior Alaska Builders Association
    Local # 0235
    938 Aspen Street
    Fairbanks, AK 99709
    http://www.InteriorABA.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska

    Construction Client Advisory: The Power of the Bonded Stop Notice Extends to Expended Construction Funds

    10 Haight Lawyers Recognized in Best Lawyers in America© 2023 and The Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch 2023

    Travelers’ 3rd Circ. Win Curbs Insurers’ Asbestos Exposure

    California Enacts New Claims Resolution Process for Public Works Projects

    Big Builder’s Analysis of the Top Ten Richest Counties

    Cameron Kalunian to Speak at Casualty Construction Defect Seminar

    BHA Attending the Construction Law Conference in San Antonio, TX

    West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar Announced for 2014

    Eminent Domain Bomb Threats Made on $775M Alabama Highway Project

    Agrihoods: The Best of Both Worlds

    Federal District Court Dismisses Property Claim After Insured Allows Loss Location to Be Destroyed Prior to Inspection

    Recent Opinions Clarify Enforceability of Pay-if-Paid Provisions in Construction Contracts

    9 Positive Housing Statistics by Builder

    Could This Gel Help Tame the California Fires?

    Relief Bill's Highway Funds Could Help Construction Projects

    Connecting Construction Project Information: Open Technology Databases Improve Project Communication, Collaboration and Visibility

    Miller Act CLAIMS: Finding Protections and Preserving Your Rights

    Ways of Evaluating Property Damage Claims in Various Contexts

    Housing Advocacy Group Moved to Dissolve New Jersey's Council on Affordable Housing

    COVID-19 Response: Essential Business Operations: a High-Stakes Question Under Proliferating “Stay at Home” Orders

    Tesla’s Solar Roof Pricing Is Cheap Enough to Catch Fire

    How One Squirrel Taught us a Surprising Amount about Insurance Investigation Lessons Learned from the Iowa Supreme Court

    New WA Law Caps Retainage on Private Projects at 5%

    Responding to Ransomware Learning from Colonial Pipeline

    Contractors: A Lesson on Being Friendly

    Association Insurance Company v. Carbondale Glen Lot E-8, LLC: Federal Court Reaffirms That There Is No Duty to Defend or Indemnify A Builder For Defective Construction Work

    When to use Arbitration to Resolve Construction Disputes

    New York Court Rejects Owner’s Bid for Additional Insured Coverage

    Third Circuit Holds No Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Despite Insured’s Expectations

    A Court-Side Seat: Appeals and Agency Developments at the Close of 2020

    Multisensory Marvel: Exploring the Innovative MSG Sphere

    Judgment Stemming from a Section 998 Offer Without a Written Acceptance Provision Is Void

    Appeals Court Overruled Insured as Additional Insured on Subcontractor’s Commercial General Liability Policy

    Breaking News: Connecticut Supreme Court Decides Significant Coverage Issues in R.T. Vanderbilt

    California Contractors: Amended Section 7141.5 Provides Important License Renewal Safety Net

    SunCal Buys Oak Knoll Development for the Second Time

    OSHA Again Pushes Back Record-Keeping Rule Deadline

    Seller Cannot Compel Arbitration for Its Role in Construction Defect Case<

    Contractors Must Register with the L&I Prior to Offering or Performing Work, or Risk Having their Breach of Contract Case Dismissed

    New Insurance Case: Owners'​ Insurance Barred in Reimbursement Action against Tenant

    Changing Course Midstream Did Not Work in River Dredging Project

    Homeowner Sues Brick Manufacturer for Spalling Bricks

    White and Williams Earns National "Best Law Firm" Rankings from US News

    Colorado Abandons the “Completed and Accepted Rule” in Favor of the “Foreseeability Rule” in Determining a Contractor’s Duty to a Third Party After Work Has Been Completed

    No Coverage for Home Damaged by Falling Boulders

    Experts Weigh In on Bilingual Best Practices for Jobsites

    Insurance Client Alert: Denial of Summary Judgment Does Not Automatically Establish Duty to Defend

    Start-up to Streamline Large-Scale Energy Renovation

    Texas EIFS Case May Have Future Implications for Construction Defects

    Counter the Rising Number of Occupational Fatalities in Construction
    Corporate Profile

    ROOFING MEMBRANE EXPERT WITNESS GRAYLING ALASKA ALASKA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska, Alaska Construction Expert Directory provides a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to builders, risk managers, and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert consulting services to the building industry's most recognized companies, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. In connection with in house personnel which comprise building envelope and design experts, forensic engineers, forensic architects, and construction cost and scheduling consultants, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska and the surrounding areas.

    Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska eifs expert witnessRoofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska architectural engineering expert witnessRoofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska structural concrete expertRoofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska construction defect expert witnessRoofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska consulting engineersRoofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska expert witness windowsRoofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska Alaska expert witness concrete failure
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Roofing membrane expert witness Grayling Alaska, Alaska

    Wildfire Smoke Threatens to Wipe Out Decades of Air Pollution Progress

    August 28, 2023 —
    The US is on track to experience its worst year for smoke exposure in decades, after wildfires in Canada sent toxic plumes drifting across the border to the Midwest and the East Coast earlier this summer. In June and July, New York and Chicago saw more “very unhealthy” and “hazardous” air quality days for fine particle pollution (PM2.5) than in the same months every year since the Environmental Protection Agency began tracking PM2.5 nationally in 2000, a Bloomberg CityLab analysis of federal data found. In Washington, DC, the number of “very unhealthy” days reached the highest in over a decade. On the EPA’s air quality index scale, these days correspond with the highest levels of public health concern. Extensive exposure to PM2.5 particles, the main pollutant found in smoke, can increase the risk of a variety of problems, including heart and respiratory disease, as well as premature death. Reprinted courtesy of Linda Poon, Bloomberg and Immanual John Milton, Bloomberg Read the full story...

    White and Williams recognized with Multiple Honorees in the Chambers 2023 USA Guide

    June 26, 2023 —
    Chambers has released their 2023 USA guide and ranked White and Williams as a leader among national law firms. The firm was recognized for recent achievements in Real Estate Finance and Insurance in Pennsylvania, and Construction in Maryland. “We are very pleased to have some of our most talented attorneys recognized again by Chambers”, said Andrew Susko, the Firm’s Managing Partner. In addition, to practice area recognition, nine lawyers were recognized and ranked highly in the 2023 Chambers USA guide from Connecticut, Pennsylvania, and Maryland. In Philadelphia, Timothy E. Davis, Partner and Chair of the Business Department, and Nancy Sabol Frantz, Chair of the Real Estate and Finance practice were recognized for their achievements in Real Estate: Finance; and, Stephen Coury, Connecticut Office Managing Partner, was ranked among the top Real Estate professionals in Connecticut. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    Traub Lieberman Senior Trial Counsel Timothy McNamara Wins Affirmation of Summary Judgment Denial

    August 28, 2023 —
    In this appeal brought before the State of New York Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department, the court ruled in favor of Traub Lieberman’s client, a housing complex owner, affirming the denial of co-defendant landscaping company’s summary judgment motion seeking dismissal of the cross-claims asserted by the complex owner against the co-defendant. In the underlying case, the plaintiff was allegedly injured when she slipped and fell on ice on the exterior stairs of the housing complex where she lived. The complex owner had contracted with the co-defendant to provide snow removal services for the complex. The plaintiff commenced action against both the complex owner and the landscaping company to recover damages for personal injuries. The complex owner asserted cross-claims against the landscaping company for contribution, common-law indemnification, and contractual indemnification. The landscaping company sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross-claims asserted against it, but the branch of the motion seeking dismissal of the cross-claims was denied. In the appeal brought before the Appellate Division, the court ruled in favor of Traub Lieberman’s client, the complex owner, affirming the denial of summary judgment for the cross-claims. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Timothy G. McNamara, Traub Lieberman
    Mr. McNamara may be contacted at tmcnamara@tlsslaw.com

    New Florida Bill Shortens Time for Construction-Defect Lawsuits

    September 06, 2023 —
    On April 13, 2023, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed Senate Bill 360 into law. This legislation alters the time period for bringing forward construction-defect lawsuits, as well as modifies the current private right of action against a contractor for violation of the Florida Building Code. First, SB 360 amends § 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes, to reduce the statute of repose from 10 years to seven years for actions founded on latent construction defects. The legislation also changes the manner in which this time period is calculated under both the seven-year statute of repose and the four-year statute of limitations for construction-defect cases. Under the prior statute, the time to commence an action began with the later of (i) the date of actual possession by the owner, (ii) the date of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy (CO), (iii) the date of abandonment of construction if not completed or (iv) the date of completion or termination of the contract. Reprinted courtesy of Jessica Zelitt, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...
    Ms. Zelitt may be contacted at jessica.zelitt@arlaw.com

    Freight Train Carrying Hot Asphalt, Molten Sulfur Plunges Into Yellowstone River as Bridge Fails

    July 10, 2023 —
    Associated Press COLUMBUS, Mont. (AP) — A bridge that crosses the Yellowstone River in Montana collapsed early Saturday, plunging portions of a freight train carrying hazardous materials into the rushing water below. Reprinted courtesy of The Associated Press, Engineering News-Record Read the full story...

    Seyfarth Shaw’s Construction Group Receives Top Tier Recognition from Legal 500

    July 05, 2023 —
    Seyfarth Shaw’s Construction group have achieved a top tier ranking in the highly regarded Legal 500 United States 2023 edition, solidifying their reputation as one of the nation’s top legal teams. This recognition reaffirms Seyfarth’s unwavering commitment to excellence in Real Estate Construction and Construction Litigation. The Legal 500 United States guide recognizes Seyfarth’s Construction practice as having a “very deep team with extensive construction knowledge as well as experts in related fields such as government contracting and business organization.” Our team is regarded by clients and peers as “collegial, intelligent, direct and adaptable.” The guide specifically recognizes the firm’s former Construction group chair, Bennett Greenberg, in their Hall of Fame. Alison Ashford, the firm’s current Construction group co-chair, is named a Leading Lawyer and Washington, DC Associate, Michael Wagner, made the Rising Stars list. Other notable mentions include, Michael McKeeman, Construction group co-chair, Jason Smith, Meghan Douris, and Ryan Gilchrist. Reprinted courtesy of Alison Ashford, Seyfarth, Michael McKeeman, Seyfarth, Bennett Greenberg, Seyfarth, Meghan Douris, Seyfarth, Jason Smith, Seyfarth, Michael Wagner, Seyfarth and Ryan Gilchrist, Seyfarth Ms. Ashford may be contacted at aashford@seyfarth.com Mr. McKeeman may be contacted at mmckeeman@seyfarth.com Mr. Greenberg may be contacted at bgreenberg@seyfarth.com Ms. Douris may be contacted at mdouris@seyfarth.com Mr. Smith may be contacted at jnsmith@seyfarth.com Mr. Wagner may be contacted at mewagner@seyfarth.com Mr. Gilchrist may be contacted at rgilchrist@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Tender Is the Fight”

    August 21, 2023 —
    A performance bond surety for a defaulted general contractor principal found itself with a recalcitrant owner which refused to accept the tender of a replacement general contractor to complete a $3,000,000 construction project in Monmouth County, New Jersey. Even before the original GC was off the job, the surety – having been notified of the contractor’s difficulties in performing the work – stepped in promptly, providing assistance in the form of an additional contractor. At the surety’s behest, that additional contractor remained on the project (focused principally at the time on roof repairs) after the initial GC was placed in default and terminated. Eventually, the surety, by draft tender agreement issued to the owner, offered that the additional contractor serve as the completion contractor for the entire project (not simply the roof repairs), a proposal rejected by the owner – which had never cared for the additional contractor. Instead, the owner proposed its own completion contractor and, in connection with that offer, demanded a sum of money ($1.6 million) from the surety – a proposal the surety rejected: “[Owner] cannot choose whatever contractor it wants to complete the work and then charge the costs to [the surety]." Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Daniel Lund III, Phelps
    Mr. Lund may be contacted at daniel.lund@phelps.com

    Insurer Springs a Leak in Its Pursuit of Subrogation

    August 21, 2023 —
    In Nationwide Prop & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Fireline Corp., No. 1:20-cv-00684, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104241, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland (District Court) considered whether the events giving rise to the plaintiff’s claims fell within the scope of a previously formed agreement, thereby rendering the plaintiff’s claims subject to the agreement’s time limitation and waiver of subrogation provisions. The District Court found that the claims fell within the scope of the agreement. The plaintiff, Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company (Insurer), provided property insurance to Maple Lawn Homeowners Association, Inc. (Maple Lawn) for common property located in Fulton, Maryland, including a community center (the Subject Premises). On January 18, 2018, Maple Lawn entered into an Inspection Agreement (the Agreement) with defendant, Fireline Corporation (Fireline), wherein Fireline agreed to provide:
    • annual fire alarm inspection and testing services,
    • quarterly sprinkler inspection and testing, and
    • annual portable fire extinguisher testing and inspection.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Katherine Dempsey, White and Williams LLP
    Ms. Dempsey may be contacted at dempseyk@whiteandwilliams.com