• Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    low-income housing expert witness White Mountain Alaska high-rise construction expert witness White Mountain Alaska structural steel construction expert witness White Mountain Alaska tract home expert witness White Mountain Alaska industrial building expert witness White Mountain Alaska condominiums expert witness White Mountain Alaska Medical building expert witness White Mountain Alaska townhome construction expert witness White Mountain Alaska Subterranean parking expert witness White Mountain Alaska retail construction expert witness White Mountain Alaska condominium expert witness White Mountain Alaska mid-rise construction expert witness White Mountain Alaska custom home expert witness White Mountain Alaska institutional building expert witness White Mountain Alaska landscaping construction expert witness White Mountain Alaska housing expert witness White Mountain Alaska multi family housing expert witness White Mountain Alaska concrete tilt-up expert witness White Mountain Alaska casino resort expert witness White Mountain Alaska custom homes expert witness White Mountain Alaska office building expert witness White Mountain Alaska production housing expert witness White Mountain Alaska
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    White Mountain, Alaska

    Alaska Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB151 limits the damages that can be awarded in a construction defect lawsuit to the actual cost of fixing the defect and other closely related costs such as reasonable temporary housing expenses during the repair of the defect, any reduction in market value cause by the defect, and reasonable and necessary attorney fees.

    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines White Mountain Alaska

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required

    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Interior Alaska Builders Association
    Local # 0235
    938 Aspen Street
    Fairbanks, AK 99709

    Mat-Su Home Builders Association
    Local # 0230
    Wasilla, AK 99654

    Home Builders Association of Alaska
    Local # 0200
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518

    Home Builders Association of Anchorage
    Local # 0215
    8301 Schoon St Ste 200
    Anchorage, AK 99518

    Kenai Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 0233
    PO Box 1753
    Kenai, AK 99611

    Northern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0225
    9085 Glacier Highway Ste 202
    Juneau, AK 99801

    Southern Southeast Alaska Building Industry Association
    Local # 0240
    PO Box 6291
    Ketchikan, AK 99901

    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For White Mountain Alaska

    'Major' Mass. Gas Leak Follows Feds Call For Regulation Changes One Year After Deadly Gas Explosions

    Client Alert: Naming of Known and Unknown Defendants in Initial Complaints: A Cautionary Tale

    Admissibility of Expert Opinions in Insurance Bad Faith Trials

    Congratulations to Haight Attorneys Selected to the 2020 Southern California Super Lawyers List

    In South Carolina, Insurer's Denial of Liability Does Not Waive Attorney-Client Privilege for Bad Faith Claim

    Privacy In Pandemic: Senators Announce Covid-19 Data Privacy Bill

    Product Defect Allegations Trigger Duty To Defend in Pennsylvania

    Will the Hidden Cracks in the Bay Bridge Cause Problems During an Earthquake?

    Shea Homes CEO Receives Hearthstone Builder Humanitarian Award

    Drafting the Bond Form, Particularly Performance Bond Form

    Client Alert: Catch Me If You Can – Giorgio Is No Gingerbread Man

    Ill-fated Complaint Fails to State Claims Against Broker and FEMA

    Exclusions Bar Coverage for Damage Caused by Chinese Drywall

    The Construction Project is Late—Allocation of Delay

    Aging-in-Place Features Becoming Essential for Many Home Buyers

    State Supreme Court Cases Highlight Importance of Wording in Earth Movement Exclusions

    Misread of Other Insurance Clause Becomes Costly for Insurer

    Contractual Assumption of Liability Does Not Bar Coverage

    NTSB Issues 'Urgent' Recommendations After Mass. Pipeline Explosions

    Scaffolding Purchase Suggests No New Building for Board of Equalization

    Appeals Court Reverses Summary Judgment over Defective Archway Construction

    Damp Weather Not Good for Wood

    Following California Law, Federal Court Adopts Horizontal Allocation For Asbestos Coverage

    DE Confirms Robust D&O Protection Despite Company Demise

    Louisiana Court Holds That Application of Pollution Exclusion Would Lead to Absurd Results

    Withholding Payment or Having Your Payment Withheld Due to Disputes on Other Projects: Know Your Rights to Offset

    How Contractors Can Prevent Fraud in Their Workforce

    Update: Lawyers Can Be Bound to Confidentiality Provision in Settlement Agreement

    First Suit Filed for Losses Caused by COVID-19

    Cold Weather Causes Power Blackouts, Disruptions on Jobsites

    Flexible Seattle Off-Ramp Would Retain Shape in Quake

    Eleventh Circuit Finds No “Property Damage” Where Defective Component Failed to Cause Damage to Other Non-Defective Components

    Wendel Rosen’s Construction Practice Group Receives “Tier 1” Ranking by U.S. News and World Reports

    Supreme Court Rejects “Wholly Groundless” Exception to Question of Arbitrability

    Miami's Condo Craze Burns Out on Strong Dollar

    The Road to Rio 2016: Zika, Super Bacteria, and Construction Delays. Sounds Like Everything is Going as Planned

    Repair of Fractured Girders Complete at Shuttered Salesforce Transit Center

    Civil RICO Case Against Johnny Doc Is Challenging

    Hartford Stadium Controversy Still Unresolved

    St. Petersburg Florida’s Tallest Condo Tower Allegedly Riddled with Construction Defects

    Second Circuit Finds Potential Ambiguity in Competing “Anti-Concurrent Cause” Provisions in Hurricane Sandy Property Loss

    Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Rose at Slower Pace in May

    Subcontractor Exception to Your Work Exclusion Paves the Way for Coverage

    North Carolina Weakened Its Building Codes in 2013

    Construction Manager Has Defense As Additional Insured

    Union THUGS Plead Guilty

    Conditional Judgment On Replacement Costs Awarded

    Distinguishing Hawaii Law, New Jersey Finds Anti-Assignment Clause Ineffective

    California Supreme Court Hands Victory to Private Property Owners Over Public Use

    Federal Court Requires Auto Liability Carrier to Cover Suit Involving Independent Contractor Despite “Employee Exclusion”
    Corporate Profile


    Through over 4500 general contracting and design related expert designations, the White Mountain, Alaska Construction Expert Directory provides a wide spectrum of trial support and consulting services to construction claims professionals seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to widely recognized construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house assets which include licensed architects, civil engineers, building envelope experts, general and specialty contractors focused on the evaluation of construction claims, the firm brings regional experience and local capabilities to White Mountain and the surrounding areas.

    White Mountain Alaska construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessWhite Mountain Alaska architecture expert witnessWhite Mountain Alaska construction expertsWhite Mountain Alaska consulting architect expert witnessWhite Mountain Alaska engineering consultantWhite Mountain Alaska construction expert witnessesWhite Mountain Alaska engineering expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    White Mountain, Alaska

    Drill Rig Accident Kills Engineering Manager, Injures Operator in Philadelphia

    August 10, 2021 —
    Philadelphia officials and engineering firm Langan have confirmed that a company project manager and geotechnical engineer died July 6 in a nighttime drill rig accident while he was on site to inspect foundation work for a pedestrian bridge project. Reprinted courtesy of Stephanie Loder, Engineering News-Record ENR may be contacted at Read the full story...

    Wilke Fleury Attorney Featured in 2022 Best Lawyers in America and Best Lawyers: Ones To Watch!

    September 13, 2021 —
    Wilke Fleury congratulates attorneys David Frenznick, Adriana Cervantes, Matthew Powell and Dan Egan on their inclusion in the 2022 Edition of Best Lawyers in America! Since it was first published in 1983, Best Lawyers® has become universally regarded as the definitive guide to legal excellence. Best Lawyers lists are compiled based on an exhaustive peer-review evaluation. Almost 108,000 industry-leading lawyers are eligible to vote (from around the world), and they have received over 13 million evaluations on the legal abilities of other lawyers based on their specific practice areas around the world. For the 2021 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America©, 9.4 million votes were analyzed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Wilke Fleury LLP

    SEC Climate Change Disclosure Letter Foreshadows Anticipated Regulatory Changes

    November 08, 2021 —
    Washington, D.C. (October 13, 2021) - In late September 2021, the Division of Corporation Finance of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a Sample Letter providing guidance to companies on how their climate disclosures will be analyzed for compliance with material risk reporting obligations. The Sample Letter precedes the SEC’s issuance of mandatory climate-related disclosure rules anticipated by year-end and signals a greater focus on specific information used to support securities filings, a development that businesses should take seriously. The Sample Letter builds on climate change guidance the SEC issued in 2010 and identifies nine categories of disclosures the SEC suggests may be material risks that must be disclosed. These include:
    • Consistency between a company’s corporate social responsibility report and its SEC filings;
    • Risks associated with climate-related legislation, regulation, or policy, and resulting compliance costs;
    • Litigation risks related to climate change; and
    • Risks linked to an array of operational and market factors, including capital expenditures, continuity of business operations, supply chain stability, changing demand, reputation, availability of credit and insurance, and other climate-change related potential impacts on the financial condition of the company.
    Reprinted courtesy of Karen C. Bennett, Lewis Brisbois and Jane C. Luxton, Lewis Brisbois Ms. Bennett may be contacted at Ms. Luxton may be contacted at Read the full story...

    Retrofitting Buildings Is the Unsexy Climate Fix the World Needs

    November 19, 2021 —
    You may not have noticed unless you live in London, but protesters have been gluing their hands to the asphalt of the city’s thundering eight-lane M25 ring road, to the weirdly technocratic war cry of “Insulate Britain!” Frustrated commuters and the police officers who’ve had to peel these sticky activists from the road find them irritating. Yet they have a point. Among top producers of climate-harming emissions that world leaders plan to address at COP26 in Glasgow in November, buildings are the summit’s largely ignored Cinderella. Making homes and offices leak less heat and persuading the construction industry to give up its addiction to demolition and to energy-intensive materials such as concrete, plastics, and steel have so far proved less than appealing to governments in search of solutions to the climate challenge. Retrofitting is costly and disruptive for the voters who happen to live, in the U.K. alone, in the 28 million homes that need an upgrade. It also demands the systemic transformation of a fragmented industry that’s riddled with vested interests, says Stephen Good, chief executive of the Construction Scotland Innovation Centre along Glasgow’s southern underbelly. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Marc Champion, Bloomberg

    Hurricane Handbook: A Policyholder's Guide to Handling Claims during Hurricane Season

    October 11, 2021 —
    SDV's Natural Disaster Recovery Group presents the Hurricane Handbook: A Policyholder's Guide to Handling Claims during Hurricane Season. This handbook intends to be a practical guide on policyholder issues, both homeowners and business owners alike, when preparing for hurricane season and handling claims after a loss due to a hurricane. The handbook is a living document that will evolve over time, as our Natural Disaster Recovery Group members continue to contribute new and expansive content on the complex issues arising in this area. Remember to check back for additional information and updated content regarding the Hurricane Season Policyholder’s Handbook. I. Are You Adequately Insured for a Hurricane? Understanding the various types of coverage policyholders can purchase is vital to weathering the financial storm following a natural disaster. Reprinted courtesy of Tracy Alan Saxe, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, Kelly A. Johnson, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, Samantha M. Oliveira, Saxe Doernberger & Vita and R. G. Nelson, Saxe Doernberger & Vita Mr. Saxe may be contacted at Ms. Johnson may be contacted at Ms. Oliveira may be contacted at Ms. Nelson may be contacted at Read the full story...

    Disputes Over Arbitrator Qualifications: The Northern District of California Offers Some Guidance

    August 10, 2021 —
    The selection of an arbitration panel can often lead to disputes between the parties regarding things like whether a particular candidate is qualified, whether a challenge to an arbitrator’s qualifications can be addressed pre-award and whether a party that names an unqualified arbitrator should lose the opportunity to name a replacement. In Public Risk Innovations v. Amtrust Financial Services, No. 21-cv-03573, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129464 (N.D. Ca. July 12, 2021), the court provided answers on all three of these issues. In Amtrust, the parties filed cross-motions to compel arbitration. Although both parties agreed the dispute was arbitrable, they disagreed about whether Public Risk Innovations, Solutions and Management’s (PRISM) arbitrator was qualified under the terms of the applicable contract. In seeking to have PRISM’s arbitrator disqualified, Amtrust argued that he: (1) was not a “current or former official of an insurance or reinsurance company”; and (2) was not “disinterested.” Amtrust also argued that because PRISM named an unqualified arbitrator (and presumably the time to appoint had passed), PRISM should be deemed to have failed to select an arbitrator as required by the contract and that Amtrust had the right to select a second arbitrator of its choice. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Justin K. Fortescue, White and Williams
    Mr. Fortescue may be contacted at

    Planes, Trains and Prevailing Wages. Ok, No Planes, But Trains and Prevailing Wages Yes

    October 25, 2021 —
    The California Supreme Court doesn’t often delve into construction-related issues, but this year we’ve got two cases, both related to the payment of prevailing wages on California public works projects. The first, Mendoza v. Fonseca McElroy Grinding Co., Inc. (2021) 11 Cal.5th 1118 which we discussed in our last blog post, concerned whether mobilization work qualifies as a “public work” and in turn requires the payment of prevailing wages. On the same day that the Supreme Court issued its decision in Mendoza, it issued a decision in Busker v. Wabtec Corporation, et al. , Case No. S251135 (August 16, 2021). This is the equivalent of being struck by lightning twice. In Busker, the California Supreme Court considered whether on a public transportation project “field work” (e.g., building and outfitting radio towers on land adjacent to train tracks) and “onboard work” (e.g., installing electronic components on train cars and locomotives”) requires the payment of prevailing wage. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at

    Construction Delays: Which Method Should Be Used to Calculate Delay?

    July 25, 2021 —
    If you need to prove and allocate construction project delays, you should engage a scheduling consultant qualified with CPM (critical path method) analysis. You should also engage counsel to assist in preserving your rights, as well as presenting and maximing your arguments for delay. There are numerous methodologies used to quantify and allocate delay. You want to discuss the most effective analysis for your case and facts including whether you want/should use a forward-looking prospective analysis or a backward-looking retrospective analysis that factors in as-built data. In doing so, you want to make sure you understand the pros and cons of each methodology including the bases to attack the methodology that will be subject to cross-examination. The five primary CPM methodologies are as follows:
    1. As-Planned Versus As-Built. This methodology compares the as-planned baseline schedule to an as-built schedule reflecting progress to assign delay. An as-built schedule that reflects progress includes actual start dates, finish dates, and durations. The actual dates and durations are compared with the as-planned dates and durations on the baseline schedule to determine delay. Under this methodology, the delay impact is determined retrospectively.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris, P.A.
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at