BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Subterranean parking Anaheim California multi family housing Anaheim California office building Anaheim California tract home Anaheim California custom homes Anaheim California mid-rise construction Anaheim California high-rise construction Anaheim California hospital construction Anaheim California landscaping construction Anaheim California casino resort Anaheim California condominiums Anaheim California Medical building Anaheim California structural steel construction Anaheim California custom home Anaheim California condominium Anaheim California low-income housing Anaheim California production housing Anaheim California institutional building Anaheim California concrete tilt-up Anaheim California retail construction Anaheim California industrial building Anaheim California housing Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California

    Statute of Limitations Upheld in Construction Defect Case

    Harmon Towers Case to Last into 2014

    Contractor Removed from Site for Lack of Insurance

    There is No Non-Delegable Duty on the Part of Residential Builders in Colorado

    Insurers Reacting to Massachusetts Tornadoes

    Construction Defects in Home a Breach of Contract

    Ohio Court Finds No Coverage for Construction Defect Claims

    The Complete and Accepted Work Doctrine and Construction Defects

    Judge Concludes Drywall Manufacturer Sold in Florida

    Construction Firm Sues City and Engineers over Reservoir Project

    Ohio “property damage” caused by an “occurrence.”

    Consumer Protection Act Whacks Seattle Roofing Contractor

    California Supreme Court Binds Homeowner Associations To Arbitration Provisions In CC&Rs

    Water Is the Enemy

    Pennsylvania Court Extends Construction Defect Protections to Subsequent Buyers

    Court Sends Construction Defect Case from Kansas to Missouri

    Eleventh Circuit Asks Georgia Supreme Court if Construction Defects Are Caused by an "Occurrence"

    Houses Can Still Make Cents: Illinois’ Implied Warranty of Habitability

    Georgia Law: “An Occurrence Can Arise Where Faulty Workmanship Causes Unforeseen or Unexpected Damage to Other Property”

    Construction Company Head Pleads Guilty to Insurance and Tax Fraud

    Housing Prices Up through Most of Country

    Safer Schools Rendered Unsafe Due to Construction Defects

    Homeowners Not Compelled to Arbitration in Construction Defect Lawsuit

    History of Defects Leads to Punitive Damages for Bankrupt Developer

    California Supreme Court Finds Associations Bound by Member Arbitration Clauses

    Massachusetts Couple Seek to Recuse Judge in Construction Defect Case

    Bill Seeks to Protect Legitimate Contractors

    Reference to "Man Made" Movement of Earth Corrects Ambiguity

    Construction Law Client Alert: California Is One Step Closer to Prohibiting Type I Indemnity Agreements In Private Commercial Projects

    Celebrities Lose Case in Construction Defect Arbitration

    “Details Matter” is the Foundation in a Texas Construction Defect Suit

    Texas exclusions j(5) and j(6).

    San Diego Construction Defect Claim Settled for $2.3 Million

    Quarter Four a Good One for Luxury Homebuilder

    SB800 Cases Approach the Courts

    Texas res judicata and co-insurer defense costs contribution

    No Coverage For Damage Caused by Chinese Drywall

    Negligent Construction an Occurrence Says Ninth Circuit

    Ghost Employees Steal Jobs from Legit Construction Firms

    Hawaii State Senate Requires CGL Carriers to Submit Premium Information To State Legislature

    Residential Construction Down in San Diego

    Illinois Court Determines Insurer Must Defend Negligent Misrepresentation Claim

    Allowing The Use Of a General Verdict Form in a Construction Defect Case Could Subject Your Client to Prejudgment Interest

    Construction Job Opening Rise in October

    Insurer Has Duty to Defend Despite Construction Defects

    Southern California Lost $8 Billion in Construction Wages

    Hilton Grand Vacations Defect Trial Delayed

    Foundation Arbitration Doesn’t Preclude Suing Over Cracks

    Statute of Repose Dependant on When Subcontractors Finished

    Lien Law Unlikely To Change — Yet

    Appeals Court Reverses Summary Judgment over Defective Archway Construction

    Colorado Court of Appeals Rejects Retroactive Application of C.R.S. § 13-20-808.

    Preventing Costly Litigation Through Your Construction Contract

    Court Clarifies Sequence in California’s SB800

    New Safety Standards Issued by ASSE and ANSI

    Joinder vs. Misjoinder in Colorado Construction Claims: Roche Constructors v. One Beacon

    High School Gym Closed by Construction Defects

    Court finds subcontractor responsible for defending claim

    “Other Insurance” and Indemnity Provisions Determine Which Insurer Must Cover

    Insurer Must Defend Claims for Diminution in Value of Damaged Property

    Construction Defects Leave Animal Shelter Unusable

    Harmon Towers Duty to Defend Question Must Wait, Says Court

    General Contractors Must Plan to Limit Liability for Subcontractor Injury

    Lien Claimant’s Right to Execute against Bond Upheld in Court of Appeals

    The U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Rules on Greystone

    Condo Board May Be Negligent for not Filing Construction Defect Suit in a Timely Fashion

    Judge Rejects Extrapolation, Harmon Tower to Remain Standing

    District Court Awards Summary Judgment to Insurance Firm in Framing Case

    In Oregon Construction Defect Claims, “Contract Is (Still) King”

    A Downside of Associational Standing - HOA's Claims Against Subcontractors Barred by Statute of Limitations

    Changes to Arkansas Construction and Home Repair Laws

    Court Requires Adherence to “Good Faith and Fair Dealing” in Construction Defect Coverage

    Application of Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine Supports Coverage

    Coverage Rejected Under Owned Property and Alienated Property Exclusions

    Excess Carrier Successfully Appeals Primary Insurer’s Summary Judgment Award

    Orange County Home Builder Dead at 93

    OSHA Extends Temporary Fall Protection Rules

    New Households Moving to Apartments

    Harmon Hotel Construction Defect Update

    Construction Defects: 2010 in Review

    One Colorado Court Allows Negligence Claim by General Contractor Against Subcontractor

    Exclusions Bar Coverage for Damage Caused by Chinese Drywall

    Gut Feeling Does Not Disqualify Expert Opinion

    Steps to Defending against Construction Defect Lawsuits

    Wisconsin “property damage” caused by an “occurrence.”

    Illinois Court Determines Insurer Must Defend Property Damage Caused by Faulty Workmanship

    Australian Developer Denies Building Problems Due to Construction Defects

    Florida Construction Defect Case Settled for $3 Million

    Loss Caused by Seepage of Water Not Covered

    Arizona Court of Appeals Rules Issues Were Not Covered in Construction Defect Suit
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Anaheim, California Construction Expert Witness Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Anaheim California forensic architect construction scheduling expert witnessAnaheim California forensic architect consulting engineersAnaheim California forensic architect OSHA expert witness constructionAnaheim California forensic architect construction project management expert witnessAnaheim California forensic architect roofing and waterproofing expert witnessAnaheim California forensic architect building code expert witnessAnaheim California forensic architect building expert
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    Virginia Homebuilding Slumps After Last Year’s Gain

    June 19, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    As of May, only 61 residential construction permits have been issues in Roanoke County, Virginia, leaving officials doubtful that this year will meet last year’s mark of 179 permits. Residential construction was at its highest in the county in 2004. The worst year since then was 2009, when the county issued 143 permits. The county is in the western end of the state, near the border with West Virginia, and far from the D.C. metropolitan area.

    Arnold Covey, the Director of Community Development for the county said that “it may be until 2014 before we really see a difference. The article by WDBJ7.com notes that a “key part” of the county budget comes from real estate.

    Read the full story…


    Insurance Company Must Show that Lead Came from Building Materials

    August 17, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals for Louisiana has reversed the summary judgment of a lower court in the case of Widder v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Company. Judge Roland L. Belsome wrote the opinion for the panel of three judges. Ms. Widder discovered that her home and its content were contaminated by lead. She applied to her insurer, Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance, which denied her claim.

    In response to Ms. Widder’s suit, LCPIC applied for a summary judgment on the grounds that there was no physical loss and that the policy did not cover defective material, latents defects, and pollution damage.

    The appeals court found that the lead contamination of Widder’s home did meet the standards of a direct physical loss, citing a recent Chinese Drywall case. There, it was found, “when a home has been rendered unusable or uninhabitable, physical damage is not necessary.”

    The lower court addressed only one of LCPIC’s exclusions, addressing only the exclusion on basis of “faulty, inadequate or defective material.” The appeals court noted that the evidence offered at trial does not show that the building materials were the source of the lead. This provided the appeals court with a matter of fact to remand to the lower court.

    Read the court’s decision…


    Judge Okays Harmon Tower Demolition, Also Calls for More Testing

    August 2, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Vegas.Inc reports that Clark County District Court Judge Elizabeth Gonzalez has permitted the demolition the tower, which MGM Resorts has claimed is a safety hazard. Perini Building Co. claims that the building does not need to be demolished. CityCenter claims that repairing the building would take nearly a year longer than a demolition and cost about $200 million. Further, CityCenter assumes that the building’s reputation would cost it another $30 million.

    Subsequently, Judge Gonzalez ruled that the pattern of destructive testing would not support a claim that there were an estimated 1,400 defective items in the building. An attorney for CityCenter, Steve Morris, has suggested that they may seek more testing, impossible to do once the building is demolished. CityCenter issued a statement that “nearly every time CityCenter has chipped away concrete to review structural work at the Harmon, we have found defects.” They describe the building as “unusable.”

    Tutor Perini contends that it “remains confident that it will prevail when the issues of safety, reparability and responsibility for the issues facing the Harmon tower are considered.

    Read the full story…


    Construction Defects Are Occurrences, Says Georgia Supreme Court

    July 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Michael Bradford writes about the implications of a March decision of the Georgia Supreme Court in which the court found that “negligent construction resulting in damage to surrounding property constitutes an occurrence under a commercial general liability policy. The contractor in the case, American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Co. Inc. vs. Hathaway Development Co. Inc, argued that a damage caused by a plumbing subcontractor’s work was covered. American Empire was the insurer for the plumbing subcontractor.

    Bradford notes that this follows similar decisions in other courts. The George court ruled that “an occurrence can arise where faulty workmanship causes unforeseen or unexpected damage to other property.”

    Read the full story…


    Texas Construction Firm Files for Bankruptcy

    December 20, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    A Texas construction firm, founded in 1937, filed for bankruptcy, bringing twenty-two projects to a sudden halt, and resulting in the loss of jobs for hundreds of employees. Ballenger Construction told its employees to go home, as it could not complete the jobs. In some cases, work will need to be done to ensure that the work sites do not cause public safety hazards.

    Read the full story…


    MGM Seeks to Demolish Harmon Towers

    September 1, 2011 — CJD Staff

    Citing public safety concerns and the cost of repair, MGM Resorts International is seeking to demolish the unfinished hotel tower. The company has a few hurdles to go through before they start laying the charges to implode the structure. Any plans would have to be approved by not only Clark County officials, but also the district court has an order blocking any activity during litigation between MGM and the general contractor on the project, Perini Building Company.

    Architectural Record reports that MGM states it would take “approximately 18 months to conduct test and come up with an approved, permitted design to fix the Harmon.” MGM feels that repairs would then take another two to three years. Perini contends that they could “provide stamped drawings detailing all necessary repairs within three months.” They attribute MGM’s desire to demolish the building as “buyer’s remorse.”

    Read the full story…


    Unfinished Building Projects Litter Miami

    November 18, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Buildings born in ambitious development plans that were never brought to completion form a grim reminder of the building bust in Miami, according to an article in the Miami Herald. One project started in 2007 as a residential project, later there were hopes to develop it as a hotel. These plans are ten months old with no work done.

    Another project was projected as a 30-story office and commercial tower. Four were built before the project was abandoned. The article describes the site as “squalid.” Another project completed the planned 17 stories, but no work has been done beyond constructing the shell. Once planned as luxury condos, the owner owes more than $30,000 in property taxes.

    Each of the three sites profiled in the Miami Herald have become dumping grounds for trash. The building skeletons have also become damaged by the elements. Some abandoned projects have been taken over by homeless people. Businesses near the abandoned properties have been hurt. The buildings also represent failed obligations to subcontractors who have put liens on the properties for work they performed but were never paid for.

    Read the full story…


    Preparing For the Worst with Smart Books & Records

    November 7, 2012 — Douglas Reiser, Builders Counsel

    Contractors are often too caught up in keeping the wheel of business churning to recognize deficiencies in how their records are managed. Working hard and working often tend to leave little time for consideration of your documents. But all too often I see the unthinkable, a contractor gets into trouble and has to call on its surety for help. At that point, you might finally get your first dose of reality about your records ?Äì and it can cost you.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Douglas Reiser of Reiser Legal LLC. Mr. Reiser can be contacted at info@reiserlegal.com


    Homebuilding Still on the Rise

    December 20, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The National Association of Home Builders reports that spending on private homes was up three percent in October 2012, bringing it to a four-year high. This was part of a trend in which fourteen of the last fifteen months have seen increases in spending on residential construction. Likewise, multifamily residences have seen thirteen months of increased spending, putting it 82% higher than its low, two years ago. ¬?In addition to new homes, remodeling is also up, reaching its highest point in five years.

    Read the full story…


    Defective Shingle Claims Valid Despite Bankruptcy

    June 19, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Third Circuit Court has allowed claims to go forward against Owens Corning for making allegedly defective shingles. The shingles split, leading to leaking roofs. The building products manufacturer filed for bankruptcy in 2000, which “extinguished” claims against it. The company was facing millions in liabilities over asbestos lawsuits.

    The lawsuit was filed in 2009. The courts initially found the lawsuit timely, but the Third Circuit Court later applied determined the exposure stated before the bankruptcy. On appeal, the court has reversed this and is again allowing the suit to proceed.

    Read the full story…


    Contractor Removed from Site for Lack of Insurance

    October 28, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The MetroWest Daily News reports that a demolition firm was told to leave the construction site at Natick High School since their failure to have workers compensation insurance makes them unable to work on the project. The contractor, Atlantic Dismantling and Site Construction, Inc. may have been working illegally since September.

    The equipment that Atlantic had rented for the job was repossessed in August. Brait Builders Corp, the general contractor for the site had rented equipment so Atlantic could continue their work.

    Their lack of insurance was discovered when a worker had a minor job-related injury. The state had issued a stop-work order for the firm and they could not legally bid on public projects. The school system did not receive any notice of this, and the school’s facilities director said of the general contractor, “chances are Brait never heard of anything either.”

    Read the full story...


    Time to Repair Nevada’s Construction Defect Laws?

    February 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Builders Magazine writes that during the previous session of the Nevada legislature, reforms sought by the building industry were stopped by the Speaker of the Nevada Assembly. The new session brings a new speaker and new hope for construction defect reform in Nevada.

    Pat Hickey, a member of the Assembly and a small business owner told The Builders Magazine that “we need to apply pressure on the legislators to fix the law.” He also recommended that people “go to Governor Sandoval and ask for his help.” Builders seeks legislation that will include right to repair and it should “define construction defect in such a way that it allows for a fair process.”

    Read the full story…


    Window Manufacturer Weathers Recession by Diversifying

    October 28, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    American Openings, a Tuscon-based window manufacturer, has responded to the loss of its sales of windows for new home construction by moving into new markets. The Arizona Daily Star reports that American Openings used to see providing windows for new homes as half their business. Now, Tom Regina, the founder and president says “single family is just dead.”

    Their products are insulated windows, designed to comply with Energy Star standards. Without new homes being built, now the company is focusing on homeowners and building owners looking for more energy efficient windows. As the windows have two or three panes and special coatings, homeowners using them are eligible for tax credits.

    One of their newer products combines their energy-saving coatings with “break resistant” glass. The article notes that the windows repel “all but the most determined burglars.” However, the company is still awaiting special equipment to cut the glass.

    Read the full story...


    Bill Seeks to Protect Legitimate Contractors

    December 20, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The California construction industry sees Senate Bill 863 as a needed help to legitimate construction businesses. The bill introduces regulations that will help shut down fraudulent contractors and help reduce workers’ compensation fraud. John Upshaw of the Independent Roofing Contractors of California described the revenue lost to California and other states as “phenomenal,” saying that “we need to continue the coordinated efforts if we are to see true workers’ compensation reform.”

    Read the full story…


    San Diego Construction Defect Claim Settled for $2.3 Million

    July 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Nauman Law firm has settled the lawsuit by the Latitude Owners Association against CS-Crossroads and others, as reported in the Sacramento Bee from a press release by the firm. The owners at Latitude, a condominium community in San Diego, found that hillside crawl spaces were not property waterproofed, leading to rotting plywood, water intrusion, and pipe leaks. There were additional problems with retrofitted windows and repairs of outside decks. The case was filed in San Diego Superior Court, but settled after multiple mediations.

    Read the full story…


    South Carolina Legislature Redefining Occurrences to Include Construction Defects in CGL Policies

    April 1, 2011 — April 1, 2011 Beverley BevenFlorez - Construction Defect Journal

    The question of what circumstances must be in place for construction defects to be covered in a general commercial liability (CGL) policies is being raised by the courts and the legislature in South Carolina. The Insurance Journal reports that the American Insurance Association as well as the Property and Casualty Insurers Association of America are speaking out on the issue.

    The problem seems to be centered on what defines an “occurrence.” CGL policies were not meant to cover faulty workmanship, according to the filing by the South Carolina Supreme Court. In January of this year, the South Carolina Supreme Court reversed the ruling in Crossmann Communities v Harleysville Mutual declaring that “Respondents cannot show the damage here was the result of an occurrence. Rather, the damage was a direct result and the natural and expected consequence of faulty workmanship; faulty workmanship did not cause an occurrence resulting in damage.” They focused their attention on the word “accident,” stating that there is a fortuity element that is not diminished.

    The South Carolina legislature reacted by producing a bill that would add new language directly negating the ruling by the Supreme Court. The South Carolina bill S-431 would change the definition of an occurrence in regards to construction defects as follows: “For a liability insurance policy issued to a construction professional, an ‘occurrence’ means, at a minimum: (1) an accident; or (2) continuous or repeated exposure to substantially the same general harmful condition or substance. No additional requirement of a fortuitous event is needed to constitute an ‘occurrence.’”

    S-431 is currently residing in the House Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry.

    Read the full story...


    Alaska Supreme Court Dismisses Claims of Uncooperative Pro Se Litigant in Defect Case

    August 11, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The Alaska Supreme Court found that in the case of Khalsa v. Chose, Ms. Khalsa? failure to cooperate with the courts has obligated them to dismiss her claims against Mr. Chose. Ms. Khalsa bought a home kit from Mandala Custom Homes of Nelson, British Columbia, Canada. Mr. Chose, one of the owners of Mandala was paid by Ms. Khalsa to supervise assembly in Fairbanks. After construction, the roof developed leaks. Ms. Khalsa stated that when climbing a ladder to inspect a skylight leak, she fell and injured herself.

    During the subsequent suit, Khalsa proved uncooperative. She skipped a pretrial conference. She attended a hearing that set discovery deadlines but then did not comply with discovery, including her failure to provide medical records documenting her injuries. She eventually said that she would only be able to travel from Arizona to Alaska if the defendants paid for her and her caretaker?s expenses.

    When finally deposed, Khalsa terminated the deposition after five minutes, alleging the deposition was “intentionally designed to cause [her] to endure further emotional distress, due to the psychological trauma . . . that was caused or contributed to by the defendants.”

    Eventually, the lower court sanctioned her twice. In July, 2008, the court concluded that her failure to provide medical records required dismissal of her injury lawsuit. In October of that year, the court dismissed all remaining claims due to her “pattern of excuses and long delays in providing information for discovery culminating in her refusal to participate in her deposition by the defendants.” Further, Khalsa has argued that the trial court displayed “prejudice and bias toward the pro se plaintiff.”

    The Alaska Supreme Court rejected all of Ms. Khalsa?s claims, dismissing her case. They did, however, note that she has thirty days to file an appeal.

    Read the court’s decision…


    Who Is To Blame For Defective — And Still LEED Certified — Courthouse Square?

    September 1, 2011 — Douglas Reiser, Builders Counsel

    Remember Courthouse Square? I sure do. We have talked about the closed and evacuated LEED certified building a couple of times here on Builders Counsel. Well, it’s back in the news. This time building professionals are pointing fingers — but there is some talk about a fix. Still, its LEED certification remains.

    If you read my past articles about Courthouse Square, you can get caught up on this mess. The short of it is that Salem, Oregon had the five-story government building and bus mall completed in 2000 for $34 Million. It was awarded LEED certification during the USGBC’s infancy. Last year, it became public that the building had significantly defective concrete and design. The Salem-Keizer Transit District worked with the City of Salem to shut the building down, and it has not been occupied since.

    Last fall, Courthouse Square failed thorough forensic testing leading to a lengthy bout with a number of insurers.  The contractors and designers had been hauled into court, but the Transit District was able to settle with the architect and contractors. The only remaining party involved in the lawsuit appears to be the engineering firm, Century West Engineering. Most expert reports have pinned the responsibility for the poor design and materials on Century West’s shoulders.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Douglas Reiser of Reiser Legal LLC. Mr. Reiser can be contacted at info@reiserlegal.com