BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    multi family housing Anaheim California casino resort Anaheim California retail construction Anaheim California Medical building Anaheim California institutional building Anaheim California custom homes Anaheim California townhome construction Anaheim California hospital construction Anaheim California mid-rise construction Anaheim California condominiums Anaheim California custom home Anaheim California production housing Anaheim California condominium Anaheim California industrial building Anaheim California high-rise construction Anaheim California low-income housing Anaheim California office building Anaheim California landscaping construction Anaheim California tract home Anaheim California parking structure Anaheim California housing Anaheim California structural steel construction Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California

    Ensuing Loss Provision Does Not Salvage Coverage

    Florida trigger

    Appeals Court Upholds Decision by Referee in Trial Court for Antagan v Shea Homes

    Home Repair Firms Sued for Fraud

    No Third-Quarter Gain for Construction

    Contractor Underpaid Workers, Pocketed the Difference

    Homebuilding on the Rise in Nation’s Capitol

    Ohio Court Finds No Coverage for Construction Defect Claims

    Another Guilty Plea in Las Vegas HOA Scandal

    New Washington Law Nixes Unfair Indemnification in Construction Contracts

    Celebrities Lose Case in Construction Defect Arbitration

    Construction Firm Charged for Creating “Hail” Damage

    Lower Court “Eminently Reasonable” but Wrong in Construction Defect Case

    A Loud Boom, But No Serious Injuries in World Trade Center Accident

    Houses Can Still Make Cents: Illinois’ Implied Warranty of Habitability

    Plans Go High Tech

    Insurance Policy Provides No Coverage For Slab Collapse in Vision One

    Arizona Homeowners Must Give Notice of Construction Defect Claims

    Legislatures Shouldn’t Try to Do the Courts’ Job

    More Charges in Las Vegas HOA Construction Defect Scam

    FHA Lists Bridges and Overpasses that May Have Defective Grout

    Instant Hotel Tower, But Is It Safe?

    Eighth Circuit Remands to Determine Applicability of Collapse Exclusion

    Harmon Hotel Construction Defect Update

    Contractor’s Coverage For Additional Insured Established by Unilateral Contract

    General Contractors Must Plan to Limit Liability for Subcontractor Injury

    Federal District Court Continues to Find Construction Defects do Not Arise From An Occurrence

    Restitution Unlikely in Las Vegas Construction Defect Scam

    Homeowner Has No Grounds to Avoid Mechanics Lien

    Ensuing Loss Found Ambiguous, Allowing Coverage

    Michigan Supreme Court Concludes No Statute of Repose on Breach of Contract

    Flooded Courtroom May be Due to Construction Defect

    Fifth Circuit Asks Texas Supreme Court to Clarify Construction Defect Decision

    No Coverage for Counterclaim Alleging Construction Defects Pled as Breach of Contract

    Mark Van Wonterghem To Serve as Senior Forensic Consultant in the Sacramento Offices of Bert L. Howe & Associates, Inc.

    Architectural Firm Disputes Claim of Fault

    Fourteen More Guilty Pleas in Las Vegas Construction Defect Scam

    Delaware “occurrence” and exclusions j(5) and j(6)

    Save a Legal Fee: Prevent Costly Lawsuits With Claim Limitation Clauses

    Ambitious Building Plans in Boston

    Couple Sues Attorney over Construction Defect Case, Loses

    Tampa Condo Owners Allege Defects

    Dust Infiltration Due to Construction Defect Excluded from Policy

    Georgia Supreme Court Rules Construction Defects Can Constitute an Occurrence in CGL Policies

    Construction Spending Dropped in July

    Florida Chinese drywall, pollution exclusion, “your work” exclusion, and “sistership” exclusion.

    Official Tried to Influence Judge against Shortchanged Subcontractor

    Construction Defect Litigation at San Diego’s Alicante Condominiums?

    Failure to Meet Code Case Remanded to Lower Court for Attorney Fees

    Florida Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Homeowners Unaware of Construction Defects and Lack of Permits

    Cleveland Condo Board Says Construction Defects Caused Leaks

    Montrose Language Interpreted: How Many Policies Are Implicated By A Construction Defect That Later Causes a Flood?

    Insurer Must Cover Construction Defects Claims under Actual Injury Rule

    High School Gym Closed by Construction Defects

    Homebuilding Still on the Rise

    In Colorado, Primary Insurers are Necessary Parties in Declaratory Judgment Actions

    Construction Defect Exception Does Not Lift Bar in Payment Dispute

    Changes To Indemnification Statute Are Here! Say Hello To Defense Duties

    Nevada Supreme Court Reverses Decision against Grader in Drainage Case

    Another Colorado District Court Refuses to Apply HB 10-1394 Retroactively

    Court Orders House to be Demolished or Relocated

    Court Consolidates Cases and Fees in Soil Construction Defect Case

    Nevada Budget Remains at Impasse over Construction Defect Law

    Insurers Reacting to Massachusetts Tornadoes

    Construction Defect Bill Introduced in California

    Arizona Court of Appeals Decision in $8.475 Million Construction Defect Class Action Suit

    After Breaching its Duty to Defend, Insurer Must Indemnify

    “Other Insurance” and Indemnity Provisions Determine Which Insurer Must Cover

    Housing Market on Way to Recovery

    AFL-CIO Joins in $10 Billion Infrastructure Plan

    Federal District Court Predicts Florida Will Adopt Injury In Fact Trigger

    Harmon Towers Case to Last into 2014

    Limiting Plaintiffs’ Claims to a Cause of Action for Violation of SB-800

    District Court Awards Summary Judgment to Insurance Firm in Framing Case

    Statutes of Limitations May be the Colorado Contractors’ Friend

    Safe Harbors- not just for Sailors anymore (or, why advance planning can prevent claims of defective plans & specs) (law note)

    History of Defects Leads to Punitive Damages for Bankrupt Developer

    Wisconsin “property damage” caused by an “occurrence.”

    Surveyors Statute Trumps Construction Defect Claim in Tennessee

    Construction Defects Lead to Demolition

    Destruction of Construction Defect Evidence Leads to Sanctions against Plaintiff

    South Carolina Legislature Defines "Occurrence" To Include Property Damage Arising From Faulty Workmanship

    Mortar Insufficient to Insure Summary Judgment in Construction Defect Case

    Residential Construction Down in San Diego

    Construction Defect Not Occurrences, Says Hawaii Court

    Increased Expenditure on Injuries for New York City School Construction

    $5 Million Construction Defect Lawsuit over Oregon Townhomes

    Windows and Lawsuits Fly at W Hotel

    Texas Court of Appeals Conditionally Grant Petition for Writ of Mandamus to Anderson

    Senate Committee Approves Military Construction Funds
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Anaheim, California Construction Expert Witness Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 5,500 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Anaheim's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Anaheim California forensic architect construction project management expert witnessAnaheim California forensic architect OSHA expert witness constructionAnaheim California forensic architect architecture expert witnessAnaheim California forensic architect building consultant expertAnaheim California forensic architect construction defect expert witnessAnaheim California forensic architect construction expert witness consultantAnaheim California forensic architect engineering expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    Partial Settlement in DeKalb Construction Management Case

    July 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The DeKalb County School District has made a partial settlement in a lawsuit over their claims of mismanagement of construction projects. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports that the school board settled with E. R. Mitchell & Co., the smaller of two firms that they have sued. As part of the settlement, Mitchell will be testifying against their former partner. Claims from the other side of the lawsuit are that the school board improperly fired the Heery/Mitchell partnership. The superintendant who fired the company, Crawford Lewis, and his chief operations office, Pat Reid, have since been charged with criminal conspiracy to defraud the construction program. A lawyer for Heery said that “we believe that when presented to a jury, Heery will be vindicated.”

    Read the full story…


    Insurers Reacting to Massachusetts Tornadoes

    August 11, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The Patriot-Ledger reports that insurers could pay out as much as $200 million to cover homes damaged or destroyed in the tornadoes that hit central and southern Massachusetts in June, 2011. Joseph Murphy, Commissioner of the State Division of Insurance didn?t foresee problems with insurers covering these claims. “At this point, there doesn’t seem to be any one company overexposed in that area,” he told the Patriot-Ledger.

    Insurance executives did not think the tornadoes would cause them to raise rates. Steve Chevalier, CEO of NLC Companies, said, “it’s a major event for those impacted by it, but it’s not close to a financial hit to us.”

    One insurer noted that the winter weather generated more claims; however the cumulative value of those claims was $15 million.

    Read the full story…


    Tacoma Construction Site Uncovers Gravestones

    August 11, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The Seattle Times reports that a transit construction project has uncovered about twenty-five gravestones. The area was historically sensitive, as it is in territory once occupied by the Puyallup Tribe. At current report, no human remains have been found and the article cites the project?s archeological consultant as describing the gravestones as “not historically significant.”

    Read the full story…


    Ohio Adopts Energy-Efficient Building Code

    June 19, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    In a compromise between environmental groups, who were looking for stricter standards, and homebuilders, who were trying to contain building costs, the state of Ohio has adopted buildings codes that will increase the energy efficiency of new homes. The estimated costs are about $1,100 with estimated annual savings of $230. According to Corey Roblee of the International Code Council, “It’s something needed in the state of Ohio.”

    The Ohio Home Builders Association opposed a proposal to adopt the guidelines of the International Code Council. Builders will be able to either follow the ICC guidelines or they can use the Ohio guidelines to meet the same energy efficiency. Vincent Squillace, the executive vice president of the OHBA, said, “We came up with an equivalent code that’s more strict but is about $2,000 cheaper per home to implement than the original code.”

    The new code will require that at least 75% of lighting must be high efficiency, increases the degree of insulation, and specifies more efficient windows, among other changes.

    Read the full story…


    Hospital Construction Firm Settles Defect Claim for $1.1 Million

    September 13, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Law360 reports that Bovis Lend Lease has settled claims of $10 million in damages for $1.1 million. Bovis was building three annexes to a hospital in Oklahoma. The hospital alleged that a faulty moisture barrier system lead to damage throughout the hospital.

    Bovis is a division of the Lend Lease Group, a multinational construction firm based Sydney, Australia.

    Read the full story…


    Injured Construction Worker Settles for Five Hundred Thousand

    October 28, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    An upstate New York man who was injured when an unsecured truss fell off the railings of a scissor lift has settled for $500,000. As the accident happened at the building site for a casino for the Seneca Nation, attorneys for the construction firm had argued that New York labor laws were inapplicable as the injury happened on Seneca Nation land. The state appeals court ruled that as none of the parties involved were Native Americans, it was not internal to the affairs of the Seneca Nation.

    Read the full story...


    Lockton Expands Construction and Design Team

    July 19, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Lockton Companies, LLC, the largest privately held independent insurance broker, has announced that it is expanding its construction and design team with the hiring of Karen Erger and Tom Miller.

    Ms. Erger will provide professional liability practice management, loss prevention, contract and complex claims management consulting services to Lockton's architectural, engineering and construction clients in her role as Vice President, Director of Practice Management. Her background includes construction litigation at a leading construction law firm, professional liability claims defense and claims consulting for major professional liability underwriters.

    Miller joins Lockton as a Senior Vice President within the Design and Construction Unit. His role will be dedicated to serving the needs of engineering, architecture and construction firms performing services around the globe. He has spent more than 15 years concentrating on professional liability for design professionals and contractors in multiple roles. He previously managed the professional liability underwriting of one of the largest construction insurers and has developed numerous manuscript insurance products as well as focused on strategic planning to enhance business unit opportunities.

    Read the full story…


    Hovnanian Increases Construction Defect Reserves for 2012

    January 6, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    In their fourth quarter earnings call, executives of Hovnanian Enterprises made some projections for investors, covering the company’s plans for 2012. During the call, Ara K. Hovnanian, the firm’s CEO, discussed their reserves to meet construction defect claims. The firm does an annual actuarial study of their construction defect reserves.

    Mr. Hovnanian noted that there have been no changes for the past several years, but this year they are increasing their reserves by about $6.3 million. Additionally, the firm has added $2.5 million to their legal reserves. Mr. Hovnanian stated “we do not anticipate that changes of this magnitude will be recurring as we look forward to 2012.”

    Read the full story…


    Construction Defect Not an Occurrence in Ohio

    November 7, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Ohio Supreme Court has concluded that claims of defective construction or workmanship are not an occurrence under a general liability policy. The court looked at appellate decisions and concluded that CGL policies are not intended to insure against risks under the control and management of the insured. These risks should instead be mitigated with performance bonds.

    The question was raised in the case Westfield Ins. Co. v. Custom Agri Systems, Inc. The Sixth District Court of Ohio concluded it was an “open question under Ohio law whether a CGL policy covers defective construction claims.” Westfield filed a motion, granted by the Sixth Circuit, to certify the question to the state Supreme Court. The Sixth Court additionally found that the contractual liability exclusion barred coverage in the case, issues a summary judgment to Westfield.

    Read the full story…


    Contractor Sues License Board

    June 30, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Judge Kendall J. Newman of the US District Court handed down a decision on June 24 on the case of Kent v California Department of Consumer Affairs. Mr. Kent, appearing as his own counsel, had brought the suit against the California Department of Consumer Affairs and the Contractors State Licensing Board after he was arrested in a sting operation and, as the plaintiff put it, “was absurdly arrested and uncooperatively detained for a time longer than necessary or allowed by law under the false pretense of contracting with out a license.” Mr. Kent’s alleged that Rick Lopez, one of the defendants, formed him to read allow from the California Business and Professions Code. He said he was later handcuffed and placed in an uncomfortable chair, “enduring physical pain and emotional agony.”

    Although Kent was given a Notice to Appear, he alleged that a further defendant, Stuart Rind, “closed the plaintiff’s case marked citation A7773 without giving written notice to anyone.” As a result, the Placer County District Attorney’s Office had no record of his Notice to Appear.

    Kent alleged that subsequently his firm was essentially shut down for two years and that he was prevented from “legally contracting or selling services for any other contractor or qualifying for any other licensed capacity governed by the CSLB.” After this, the CSLB suspended the license for his firm, DSI Construction. He was assessed a $1,500 fine, after which he claims he sent a letter to the CSLB demanding money damages. The judge noted that the letter was not included in the plaintiff’s Ninth Amended Complaint.

    Judge Kendall recommended that the plaintiff’s Complaints be dismissed, although he did allow that sixth, and perhaps the eighth and ninth, could be amended with a tenth amended complaint.

    Read the court’s decision…


    Faulty Workmanship may be an Occurrence in Indiana CGL Policies

    April 7, 2011 — April 7, 2011 Beverley BevenFlorez - Construction Defect Journal

    The question of whether construction defects can be an occurrence in Commercial General Liabilities (CGL) policies continues to find mixed answers. The United States District Court in Indiana denied the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment in the case of General Casualty Insurance v. Compton Construction Co., Inc. and Mary Ann Zubak stating that faulty workmanship can be an occurrence in CGL policies.

    Judge Theresa L. Springmann cited Sheehan Construction Co., et al. v. Continental Casualty Co., et al. for her decision, ”The Indiana Supreme Court reversed summary judgment, which had been granted in favor of the insurer in Sheehan, holding that faulty workmanship can constitute an ‘accident’ under a CGL policy, which means any damage would have been caused by an ‘occurrence’ triggering the insurance policy’s coverage provisions. The Indiana Supreme Court also held that, under identically-worded policy exclusion terms that are at issue in this case, defective subcontractor work could provide the basis for a claim under a CGL policy.”

    As we reported on April 1st, South Carolina’s legislature is currently working on bill S-431 that would change the wording of CGL policies in their state to include construction defects. Ray Farmer, Southwest region vice president of the American Insurance Association spoke out against the bill. “CGL policies were never meant to cover faulty workmanship by the contractor,” he said. “The bill’s supplementary and erroneous liability provisions will only serve to unnecessarily impact construction costs in South Carolina.”

    Read the Opinion and order...
    Read the court’s ruling...
    Read the American Insurance Association statement...


    Insurer Settles on Construction Defect Claim

    July 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Law360 reports that Arch Specialty Insurance Company has settled over claims that it wrongly denied coverage in a construction defect claim. The court dismissed Arch with prejudice. Terms of the settlement were not disclosed and the attorneys made not comment to Law360.

    Read the full story…


    Construction Defect Litigation at San Diego’s Alicante Condominiums?

    March 25, 2011 — Alicante HOA Website

    According to recent posts in the Alicante HOA website, construction experts and legal counsel have been retained. The HOA board has been informed that testing of a variety of the building’s components are underway or will begin in the near future.

    Read More...


    Arbitrator May Use Own Discretion in Consolidating Construction Defect Cases

    September 1, 2011 — CJD Staff

    The Mississippi Court of Appeals has ruled in the case of Harry Baker Smith Architects II, PLLC v. Sea Breeze I, LLC. Sea Breeze contracted with Harry Baker Smith Architects II, PLLC (HBSA) to design a condominium complex, which would be built by Roy Anderson Corporation. All parties agreed to arbitration.

    Subsequently, Sea Breeze alleged defects and sought arbitration against the architectural firm and started a separate arbitration proceeding against the contractor. The special arbitrator appointed by the American Arbitrators Association determined that it would be proper to consolidate the two actions “since they arose from a common question of fact or law.” HBSA filed in chancery court seeking injunctive relief and a reversal of the decision. Sea Breeze and Roy Anderson filed a motion to compel the consolidated arbitration.

    The court noted that the special arbitrator “established that the contract between Sea Breeze and Roy Anderson expressly allowed for consolidation of the two cases.” Further, the arbitrator “concluded that HBSA expressly agreed to consolidation by written consent through its 2008 letter, through which it insisted upon Roy Anderson’s involvement ‘in any mediation and/or arbitration.’”

    The court concluded that the chancery court “did not have the power to fulfill HBSA’s request.” The court affirmed the chancery court’s judgment.

    Read the court’s decision…


    Gilroy Homeowners Sue over Leaky Homes

    February 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Two years into a lawsuit against Shapell Homes, the builder of a subdivision called Eagle Ridge in Gilroy, California, homeowners have joined or left the lawsuit. About fifty homeowners are still in the suit, which contends that construction defects have lead to water intrusion in their homes. The lawyer for the homeowners contends that more than a hundred homes have construction defects.

    One homeowner said that soon after he joined the suit, Sharpell sent workers to his home who repaired problems to his satisfaction. “They came in within two weeks and fixed everything,” said Frank Lowry. Another homeowner, Wilson Haddow, said that he was “quite happy” after Shapell repaired problems.

    Others weren’t quite so happy. Greg Yancey said that problems had “been a nightmare” and that “it just doesn’t feel like home.” He said that his “house is possessed,” with problems that include walls that bow out and a balcony that drips rainwater to the front door. His home is currently worth far less than the $700,000 he paid in 2007.

    Read the full story…


    Manhattan Developer Breaks Ground on $520 Million Project

    November 18, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Rebuilding an area of Midtown West that has been condemned for decades, the Gotham Organization has broken ground on a 1,200-unit project that will include housing for a variety of household incomes and a school. One unit of the project will be affordable housing for families of annual incomes up to $40,000. Another will be for middle-income households. Additionally, there will be a 31-story tower with 550 luxury units.

    The site CityBiz quotes Mayor Michael Bloomberg, as saying that the project “will grow our economy by creating 2,900 construction-related jobs.” The president of the Gotham Organization, David L. Picket notes that it will “create hundreds of new jobs, generate millions of dollars in revenue for the construction industry, contribute towards the building of a new primary, and provide homes to thousands of New Yorkers.”

    Read the full story…


    Ensuing Losses From Faulty Workmanship Must be Covered

    May 10, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    Coverage for damages resulting from faulty workmanship in the construction of an apartment complex was at issue in The Bartram, LLC v. Landmark Am. Ins. Co., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44535 (N.D. Fla. March 30, 2012).

    The owner of the apartments, Bartram, had primary coverage and three layers of excess coverage. Each contract excluded loss from faulty workmanship. The policies provided, however, "if loss or damage by a Covered Cause of Loss results, we will pay for that resulting loss or damage."

    Bartram contended water intrusion occurred because of faulty workmanship, which caused damage to the buildings’ exterior and interior finishes, wood sheathing, framing, balcony systems, drywall ceilings and stucco walls. This damage was separate from the work needed to simply fix the faulty workmanship. Therefore, Bartram argued, the ensuing losses that resulted from the water intrusion was covered.

    The insurer argued the ensuing loss exception was not applicable if the ensuing loss was directly related to the original excluded loss.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Firm Sued For Construction Defects in Parking Garage

    October 23, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Northhampton County, Pennsylvania is suing a contractor who resurfaced a parking garage in 2009. According to the Express-Times, three years later, the surface is cracked and the county is seeking $700,000 for repairs. Additionally, they have withheld $44,000 of the $2.2 million contract because of the problems. John Stoffa, Northampton County Executive, says that the garage is stable, but not up to safety standards.

    Read the full story…