BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Medical building Anaheim California low-income housing Anaheim California high-rise construction Anaheim California custom homes Anaheim California industrial building Anaheim California tract home Anaheim California condominiums Anaheim California condominium Anaheim California multi family housing Anaheim California mid-rise construction Anaheim California townhome construction Anaheim California production housing Anaheim California retail construction Anaheim California office building Anaheim California casino resort Anaheim California landscaping construction Anaheim California hospital construction Anaheim California concrete tilt-up Anaheim California parking structure Anaheim California structural steel construction Anaheim California custom home Anaheim California Subterranean parking Anaheim California
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Anaheim, California

    California Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: SB800 (codified as Civil Code §§895, et seq) is the most far-reaching, complex law regulating construction defect litigation, right to repair, warranty obligations and maintenance requirements transference in the country. In essence, to afford protection against frivolous lawsuits, builders shall do all the following:A homeowner is obligated to follow all reasonable maintenance obligations and schedules communicated in writing to the homeowner by the builder and product manufacturers, as well as commonly accepted maintenance practices. A failure by a homeowner to follow these obligations, schedules, and practices may subject the homeowner to the affirmative defenses.A builder, under the principles of comparative fault pertaining to affirmative defenses, may be excused, in whole or in part, from any obligation, damage, loss, or liability if the builder can demonstrate any of the following affirmative defenses in response to a claimed violation:


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Anaheim California

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association Southern California - Desert Chapter
    Local # 0532
    77570 Springfield Ln Ste E
    Palm Desert, CA 92211
    http://www.desertchapter.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Riverside County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    3891 11th St Ste 312
    Riverside, CA 92501


    Building Industry Association Southern California
    Local # 0532
    17744 Sky Park Circle Suite 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biasc.org

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Orange County Chapter
    Local # 0532
    17744 Skypark Cir Ste 170
    Irvine, CA 92614
    http://www.biaoc.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - Baldy View Chapter
    Local # 0532
    8711 Monroe Ct Ste B
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
    http://www.biabuild.com

    Building Industry Association Southern California - LA/Ventura Chapter
    Local # 0532
    28460 Ave Stanford Ste 240
    Santa Clarita, CA 91355


    Building Industry Association Southern California - Building Industry Association of S Ca Antelope Valley
    Local # 0532
    44404 16th St W Suite 107
    Lancaster, CA 93535



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Anaheim California

    Safer Schools Rendered Unsafe Due to Construction Defects

    Ohio “property damage” caused by an “occurrence.”

    After Breaching its Duty to Defend, Insurer Must Indemnify

    Claims Under Colorado Defect Action Reform Act Count as Suits

    Construction Defects: 2010 in Review

    Injured Construction Worker Settles for Five Hundred Thousand

    Senate Committee Approves Military Construction Funds

    New OSHA Fall Rules to Start Early in Minnesota

    Brown Paint Doesn’t Cover Up Construction Defects

    Construction Defects Lead to Demolition of Seattle’s 25-story McGuire Apartments Building

    Mark Van Wonterghem To Serve as Senior Forensic Consultant in the Sacramento Offices of Bert L. Howe & Associates, Inc.

    Hawaii Building Codes to Stay in State Control

    Bad Faith and a Partial Summary Judgment in Seattle Construction Defect Case

    Homebuilding on the Rise in Nation’s Capitol

    Construction Law Client Alert: California Is One Step Closer to Prohibiting Type I Indemnity Agreements In Private Commercial Projects

    Texas Court of Appeals Conditionally Grant Petition for Writ of Mandamus to Anderson

    Quarter Four a Good One for Luxury Homebuilder

    California Lawyer Gives How-To on Pursuing a Construction Defect Claim

    Seller Cannot Compel Arbitration for Its Role in Construction Defect Case<

    The Year 2010 In Review: Design And Construction Defects Litigation

    Construction Law: Unexpected, Fascinating, Bizarre

    Construction Defects Leave Animal Shelter Unusable

    Colorado Court of Appeals holds that insurance companies owe duty of prompt and effective communication to claimants and repair subcontractors

    The Ever-Growing Thicket Of California Civil Code Section 2782

    Consulting Firm Indicted and Charged with Falsifying Concrete Reports

    West Coast Casualty Promises Exciting Line Up at the Nineteenth Annual Conference

    Will They Blow It Up?

    Construction Delayed by Discovery of Bones

    HOA Has No Claim to Extend Statute of Limitations in Construction Defect Case

    South Carolina Contractors Regain General Liability Coverage

    Bar to Raise on Green Standard

    State Audit Questions College Construction Spending in LA

    Cleveland Condo Board Says Construction Defects Caused Leaks

    Defect Claims as Occurrences? Check Your State Laws

    Harmon Towers Case to Last into 2014

    Contractor’s Coverage For Additional Insured Established by Unilateral Contract

    2011 Worst Year Ever for Home Sales

    Construction Defects Lead to Demolition

    Southern California Lost $8 Billion in Construction Wages

    Time to Repair Nevada’s Construction Defect Laws?

    Ohio Court Finds No Coverage for Construction Defect Claims

    Background Owner of Property Cannot Be Compelled to Arbitrate Construction Defects

    Fire Reveals Defects, Appeals Court Affirms Judgment against Builder

    No-Show Contractor Can’t Hide from Construction Defect Claim

    South Carolina Law Clarifies Statue of Repose

    North Carolina Exclusion j(6) “That Particular Part”

    Construction Firm Charged for Creating “Hail” Damage

    The Flood Insurance Reform Act May be Extended to 2016

    Allowing the Use of a General Verdict Form in a Construction Defect Case Could Subject Your Client to Prejudgment Interest

    There Is No Non-Delegable Duty on the Part of Residential Builders in Colorado

    No Coverage for Property Damage That is Limited to Work Completed by Subcontractor

    Ohio Court of Appeals Affirms Judgment in Landis v. Fannin Builders

    Irene May Benefit Construction Industry

    A Downside of Associational Standing - HOA's Claims Against Subcontractors Barred by Statute of Limitations

    Hawaii State Senate Requires CGL Carriers to Submit Premium Information To State Legislature

    One Colorado Court Allows Negligence Claim by General Contractor Against Subcontractor

    Connecticut Gets Medieval All Over Construction Defects

    Colorado “property damage” caused by an “occurrence” and exclusions j(5) and j(6) “that particular part”

    Driver’s Death May Be Due to Construction Defect

    Ohio Casualty’s and Beazer’s Motions were Granted in Part, and Denied in Part

    In Oregon Construction Defect Claims, “Contract Is (Still) King”

    Architectural Firm Disputes Claim of Fault

    Godfather Charged with Insurance Fraud

    No Coverage For Damage Caused by Chinese Drywall

    Preparing for Trial on a Cause of Action for Violation of Civil Code section 895, et seq.

    Nevada Supreme Court Reverses Decision against Grader in Drainage Case

    No Choice between Homeowner Protection and Bankrupt Developers?

    Webinar on Insurance Disputes in Construction Defects

    Limiting Plaintiffs’ Claims to a Cause of Action for Violation of SB-800

    In Colorado, Repair Vendors Can Bring First-Party Bad Faith Actions For Amounts Owed From an Insurer

    Contractor Sues Supplier over Defective Products

    Construction Case Alert: Appellate Court Confirms Engineer’s Duty to Defend Developer Arises Upon Tender of Indemnity Claim

    Residential Construction: Shrinking Now, Growing Later?

    Condo Board May Be Negligent for not Filing Construction Defect Suit in a Timely Fashion

    Ohio Adopts Energy-Efficient Building Code

    Construction Bright Spot in Indianapolis

    Pier Fire Started by Welders

    Nevada Court Adopts Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine

    Drug Company Provides Cure for Development Woes

    Ensuing Losses From Faulty Workmanship Must be Covered

    Damage During Roof Repairs Account for Three Occurrences

    Construction Defect Notice in the Mailbox? Respond Appropriately

    Florida: No Implied Warranties for Neighborhood Improvements

    Badly Constructed Masonry Walls Not an Occurrence in Arkansas Law

    Exclusion Bars Coverage for Mold, Fungus

    Window Manufacturer Weathers Recession by Diversifying

    Plaintiff Not Entitled to Further Damages over Defective Decking

    Home Builder Doesn’t See Long Impact from Hurricane

    Florida Chinese drywall, pollution exclusion, “your work” exclusion, and “sistership” exclusion.

    All Risk Policy Only Covers Repair to Portion of Dock That Sustains Damage
    Corporate Profile

    ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 5500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Anaheim, California Construction Expert Witness Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Anaheim's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Anaheim California forensic architect architectural expert witnessAnaheim California forensic architect construction defect expert witnessAnaheim California forensic architect multi family design expert witnessAnaheim California forensic architect construction project management expert witnessAnaheim California forensic architect construction expertsAnaheim California forensic architect construction claims expert witnessAnaheim California forensic architect slope failure expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Anaheim, California

    Preventing Costly Litigation Through Your Construction Contract

    August 17, 2011 — Douglas Reiser, Builders Counsel

    It’s Tuesday, which means it ’s the middle of your work week. Tuesday is a great time to take an hour to look over your contracts, while the crews are pushing through their scheduled work. Today’s food for thought: How do you use your contract to reduce your litigation burden?

    Your contract should do many things. It should discuss the scope of work, scheduling of work, quality of work, coverage for liabilities and conditions and timeliness for payment. But often overlooked is how your contract can lend to dispute resolution.

    Commonly, you will see a simple provision that covers governing law, venue for disputes and the awarding of attorneys’ fees. But you can do better. Remember, a contract is enforced to the maximum extent possible in Washington state.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Douglas Reiser of Reiser Legal LLC. Mr. Reiser can be contacted at info@reiserlegal.com


    Policing Those Subcontractors: It Might Take Extra Effort To Be An Additional Insured

    June 14, 2011 — Douglas Reiser, Builders Council Blog

    I just came across a case that I think truly paints the insurance dilemma for contractors. Thanks to this recent Illinois case, I don’t have to make up any factual scenarios—so kudos to Attorney Robert Boylan for posting it.

    In reading over my RSS feeds this weekend, I noticed a great writeup on long-time blogger Josh Glazov’s Construction Law Today. Attorney Robert Boylan’s post describes a recent Illinois case where a general contractor was denied its additional insured status on a second-tier subcontractor’s insurance. The reason for the denial: the general contractor failed to procure an agreement in writing with the second-tier subcontractor, requiring it to be listed as an additional insured.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Douglas Reiser of Reiser Legal LLC. Mr. Reiser can be contacted at info@reiserlegal.com


    Construction Defect Destroys Home, Forty Years Later

    June 19, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Fire investigators in Monroe, North Carolina have blamed a nail as the source of a fire that lead to a home being declared a total loss. The nail, part of the original construction, nicked a wire within a wall, causing a short, which started a fire. The home was built in the late 1960s.

    WBTV reported that the homeowner was awakened by a power outage. He went outside and saw flames coming from a vent in the roof. He was unable to contain the fire with a garden hose. Neighbors called firemen who were able to stop the blaze.

    Read the full story…


    Appropriation Bill Cuts Military Construction Spending

    June 15, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The Hill reports that HR 2055, the Military Construction, Veterans Affairs (VA) and Related Agencies bill, has passed with only five votes in opposition. The bill cuts the budget for military construction spending by $2.6 billion due to anticipated base closures.

    The bill includes $186 million for family housing construction by the Army, $100 million for family housing construction by the Navy and Marines, and $84 million for family construction by the Air Force, with an additional $50 million allocated for the DOD outside the military branches. By the act, these funds will remain available until September 30, 2016.

    Read the full story…

    Read HR 2055


    Florida trigger

    August 4, 2011 — CDCoverage.com

    In Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Siena Home Corp., No. 5:08-CV-385-Oc-10GJK (M.D. Fla. July 8, 2011), insured residential real estate developer Siena was sued by homeowners seeking damages for moisture penetration property damage resulting from exterior wall construction defects. Siena’s CGL insurer Mid-Continent filed suit seeking a declaratory judgment of no duty to defend or indemnify in part on the basis that the alleged “property damage” did not manifest during the Mid-Continent policy period.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of CDCoverage.com


    Pennsylvania Court Extends Construction Defect Protections to Subsequent Buyers

    December 20, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Pennsylvania courts have long held that there is an implied warranty of habitability for the initial purchaser of a home. Now, as some defects may not immediately show up, the court has extended that implied warranty to second and subsequent purchasers. As Marc D. Brookman, David I. Haas, and Christopher Bender of Duane Morris note, “this judicially created doctrine shifts the risk of a latent defect in the construction of a new home from the purchaser to the builder-vendor.”

    The Pennsylvania Supreme Court concluded that a contractual relationship is not needed for an implied warranty of habitability. The court’s concern was inequalities would result when a home was sold while other homes were protected by being within the statute of repose.

    Read the full story…


    Defective Grout May Cause Trouble for Bridges

    August 16, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Grout, which was used to protect the steel support cables of the Woodrow Wilson Bridge, may lead to problems instead. The Baltimore Sun reports that the Federal Highway Administration is looking at three dozen bridges in twenty-one states that were built with defective grout. The grout contains high levels of chlorides, which can lead to corrosion. The collapse of pedestrian walkway in Concord, North Carolina was attributed to chloride contamination in the grout.

    The grout, SikaGrout 300PT, was advertised as "non-corrosive, does not contain chlorides," but later testing showed that it contained levels that exceeded limits by 400 percent. Throughout the country, about 16 million pounds of this were used. Sika Corp. suspended production of the grout in 2010. If repairs need to be made, it is unclear who will pay.

    Read the full story…


    Changes to Arkansas Construction and Home Repair Laws

    September 30, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    A new law, set to take effect in 2012, lowers the ceiling on when work must be done by a licensed contractor. Through the end of the year, projects costing $20,000 or more had to be done by an Arkansas licensed contractor. As of January 1, 2012, that new limit will be $2,000.

    This will apply to all single-family residences and according to Lovely County Citizen, covers “construction, alteration, renovation, repair, modification, improvement, removal, demotion, or addition to a pre-existing structure.” Residential building contractors will be required to have workers compensation insurance, as will home improvement contactors if they take jobs worth more than $20,000.

    Morris Dillow, a building inspector in Holiday Island, said, “It will get these scammers out of here who are ripping people off.” He cited the example of a contractor who after getting paid for roof repairs and painting, left the job unfinished.

    Read the full story…


    Georgia Supreme Court Rules Construction Defects Can Constitute an Occurrence in CGL Policies

    April 5, 2011 — April 5, 2011 Beverley BevenFlorez - Construction Defect Journal

    Recently, the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed the decision in American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Company v Hathaway Development Company, Inc. stating that because Whisnant’s faulty workmanship caused damage to the surrounding properties, the construction defects constituted “occurrences” under the Commercial General Liability (CGL) policy. Unlike the South Carolina Supreme court ruling in the case of Crossman Communities v Harleysville Mutual, the Georgia Supreme Court stated that an accident can happen intentionally if the effect is not the intended result.

    Interestingly, the only dissenting judge, J. Melton, disagreed with his colleagues on the basis that “although the term ‘accident’ is not specifically defined in the policy, it is axiomatic that an ‘accident’ cannot result from ‘intentional’ behavior.” It is clear that what constitutes an occurrence in CGL policies is still being hotly debated.

    Read the full story...


    Homebuilders Go Green in Response to Homebuyer Demand

    May 10, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    McGrawHill Construction reports that 17 percent of new homes and remodels in 2011 were done with green building practices. Their report estimates that by 2016, this will rise to 29 to 38 percent of the market for home construction and remodeling.

    Consumers see the green buildings as more desirable, particularly where they are more energy efficient. Two thirds of builders noted their customers were interested in features that would lower the energy use of their homes. Consumers also feel that green building materials are more durable and see green homes as higher quality.

    Read the full story…


    Restitution Unlikely in Las Vegas Construction Defect Scam

    October 23, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The San Francisco Chronicle reports that the money lost in the Las Vegas HOA fraud cause is probably not recoverable. Victims of the scam have asked the court for restitution, but Judge Lloyd George doubts any of the money will be found, saying “the money is not available, it would appear.”

    One Vistana board members not part of the conspiracy told reporters that the $8 million construction defect settlement never went for needed repairs. “Within six months that money was gone,” said Bruce Wallace, a retired Air Force colonel. After the construction defect account was depleted to $450,000, two board members disappeared with the funds.

    Read the full story…


    Equipment Costs? It’s a Steal!

    July 8, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    KCBD reports on the problems of a Lubbock, Texas contractor. It’s hard to do the job when your tools keep getting stolen. Corey Meadows, owner of Top Cut Interiors, told KCBD that he had chained an air compressor to a table saw. Since the thieves couldn’t cut the chain, they cut the table saw “and just took the air compressor and the chain.” Meadows estimates the thieves cost him $2,000 in damaged or stolen equipment and time lost.

    Read the full story…


    Court Grants Summary Judgment to Insurer in HVAC Defect Case

    August 4, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    The US District Court in Colorado has determined in the case of RK Mechanical, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Company of America that Travelers did not breach its insurance contract when it refused to cover RK Mechanical.

    RK Mechanical performed an HVAC installation for a residential project for which J.E. Dunn Rocky Mountain was the general contractor. As part of the work, RK “installed approximately one hundred seventy-one CPVC flanges, which were manufactured by Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Company.” Two of these flanges failed in June, 2009 leading to water damage. RK replaced the cracked flanges and engaged in water remediation. “Travelers paid Dunn and RK for the costs associated with the water damage associated with the Flange Failure.” The court notes that Travelers did not pay for the cracked flanges, however.

    Subsequently, RK examined the remaining flanges, finding many cracked ones. These were replaced with new ones. Later, all the Charlotte flanges were replaced with ones from another manufacturer. RK applied for coverage.

    All sides brought in their experts: “Microbac Laboratories, Inc. prepared a report on behalf of RK concluding that the Flange Failure was due, in part, to an assembly or workmanship defect in addition to manufacturing defects in the flanges. Higgins & Associates prepared a report on behalf of Travelers concluding that the flanges failed due to improper installation. Plastic Failure Labs prepared a report on behalf of the flange manufacturer concluding that the flanges failed due to improper installation by RK.”

    At this point, Travelers denied coverage. RK sued alleging that the coverage for flange failure and water damage implicitly includes mitigation costs. The court rejected this claim, noting it would do so even if Travelers had paid for the replacement of the first two flanges. Nor did the court find that replacement of the faulty flanges is not "a covered cause of loss." RK also argued that as it was required to mitigate, Travelers was obligated to cover costs. However, the court found that “the mitigation costs expended by RK were not incurred in an effort to avoid damages from a potential breach of contract by Travelers.” The court additionally noted that despite RK’s claims, the Colorado courts have not found a common law duty to mitigate. Finally, the court found that the exclusions in the policy were not in violation of public policy.

    Read the court’s decision…


    Granting Stay, Federal Court Reviews Construction Defect Coverage in Hawaii

    January 6, 2012 — Tred Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii

    The federal district court ultimately stayed a construction defect case, but offered comments on the current status of coverage disputes for such defects in Hawaii. See National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Simpson Mfg. Co., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128481(D. Haw. Nov. 7, 2011).

    National Union filed a complaint for declaratory relief to establish it had no duty to defend or to indemnify Simpson Manufacturing Company in four actions pending in the Hawaii state courts. The state court actions concerned allegedly defective hurricane strap tie hold downs that were manufactured and sold by Simpson. The hurricane ties allegedly began to prematurely corrode and rust, causing cracking, spalling and other damage to homes.

    National Union contended the underlying allegations did not constitute "property damage" caused by an "occurrence," as defined in the policies.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com


    Drug Company Provides Cure for Development Woes

    November 18, 2011 — CDJ Staff

    Vertex Pharmaceuticals is poised to become the holder of Boston’s biggest commercial lease, paying $72.5 million for 1.1 million square feet on Boston’s waterfront. Vertex’s new buildings are still under construction, but the plans have spurred other development in the Fan Pier area, according to the New York Times. The Times quotes Mary A. Burke, a senior economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston that the Vertex project gives “a big push” to the “momentum for economic growth.”

    The Fallon Company is building Vertex’s new laboratory and office space. They are separately planning to build a high-rise with 150 luxury condominium units. According to Joseph Fallon, the chief executive and president of the Fallon Company, there is already a waiting list of 50 buyers for the condominiums.

    Across the street from the Vertex site, a group including Morgan Stanley and Boston Global Investors is planning a 23-block mixed use project that would include 1.2 million square feet of retail space. Additionally, the New England Development and the Hanover Group is building a 356-unit apartment building at the adjacent Pier 4.

    Read the full story…


    Texas covered versus uncovered allocation and “legally obligated to pay.”

    April 27, 2011 — April 27, 2011, by CDCoverage.com

    In Markel American Ins. Co. v. Lennar Corp., No. 14-10-00008-CV (Tex. Ct. App. April 19, 2011), insured homebuilder Lennar filed suit against its insurer Markel seeking recovery of costs incurred by Lennar to repair water damage to homes resulting from defective EIFS siding. Following a jury trial, judgment was entered in favor of Lennar and against Markel. On appeal, the intermediate appellate court reversed. Applying Texas law, the court first held that Lennar failed to satisfy its burden of allocating damages between covered and uncovered. In a prior decision, the court had held that, while the costs incurred by Lennar for the repair of the resulting water damage

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of CDCoverage.com


    Homebuilding on the Rise in Nation’s Capitol

    November 7, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    Is the homebuilding crunch over in DC? The Washington Post has reported that while new home construction is up throughout the country, in the DC area, construction has reached levels last seen in 2006. From January to August 2012, there were more than 19,000 building permits issued in the area, nearly doubling the number issued by that point in 2011.

    While building is on a quicker pace, what’s being built has changed. As compared to 2006, there are more townhomes, condos, and smaller homes being built. The article notes that 11 percent of new construction is condos, while in 2006, it was only 5 percent.

    Read the full story…


    New Apartment Tower on the Rise in Seattle

    September 13, 2012 — CDJ Staff

    The Seattle Times reports that groundbreaking is planned for a forty-story tower in Seattle. The building process will take at least five years, during which time, according to the paper, there will be nearly eight thousand new apartments in Seattle. The planned tower will add another 386 units to that.

    The developer, Holland Partner Group, has four other apartments buildings planned or in construction currently, which will account for more than a thousand of the units being added to the city’s apartment stock.

    Read the full story…